liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Clinical impact of influenza vaccination after ST- and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction - from the IAMI trial
Orebro Univ, Sweden; Orebro Univ, Sweden.
Lund Univ, Sweden.
Lund Univ, Sweden.
Int Ctr Diarrhoeal Dis Res, Bangladesh; Univ New South Wales, Australia.
Show others and affiliations
2023 (English)In: American Heart Journal, ISSN 0002-8703, E-ISSN 1097-6744, Vol. 255, p. 82-89Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background Influenza vaccination early after myocardial infarction (MI) improves prognosis but vaccine effectiveness may differ dependent on type of MI. Methods A total of 2,571 participants were prospectively enrolled in the Influenza vaccination after myocardial infarction (IAMI) trial and randomly assigned to receive in-hospital inactivated influenza vaccine or saline placebo. The trial was conducted at 30 centers in eight countries from October 1, 2016 to March 1, 2020. Here we report vaccine effective-ness in the 2,467 participants with ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI, n = 1,348) or non-ST-segment elevation MI (NSTEMI, n = 1,119). The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause death, MI, or stent thrombosis at 12 months. Cumulative incidence of the primary and key secondary endpoints by randomized treatment and NSTEMI/STEMI was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Treatment effects were evaluated with formal interaction testing to assess for effect modification. Results Baseline risk was higher in participants with NSTEMI. In the NSTEMI group the primary endpoint occurred in 6.5% of participants assigned to influenza vaccine and 10.5% assigned to placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.60; 95% CI, 0.39-0.91), compared to 4.1% assigned to influenza vaccine and 4.5% assigned to placebo in the STEMI group (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.54-1.50, P = .237 for interaction). Similar findings were seen for the key secondary endpoints of all-cause death and cardiovascular death. The Kaplan-Meier risk difference in all-cause death at one year was more pronounced in participants with NSTEMI (NSTEMI: HR, 0.47; 95% CI 0.28-0.80, STEMI: HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.43-1.70, interaction P = .028). Conclusions The beneficial effect of influenza vaccination on adverse cardiovascular events may be enhanced in patients with NSTEMI compared to those with STEMI.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
MOSBY-ELSEVIER , 2023. Vol. 255, p. 82-89
National Category
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-190469DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2022.10.005ISI: 000888092200001PubMedID: 36279930OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-190469DiVA, id: diva2:1718157
Note

Funding Agencies|Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation [20150284]; Danish Heart Foundation [16-R107-A6596-22958]; ALF Grants; Nyckelfonden; Region Orebro, Sweden; SanofiPasteurr, Lyon, France

Available from: 2022-12-12 Created: 2022-12-12 Last updated: 2025-02-10

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lauermann, Jörg
By organisation
Department of Health, Medicine and Caring SciencesFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences
In the same journal
American Heart Journal
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 64 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf