liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The LEAP checklist for laboratory evaluation and analytical performance characteristics reporting of clinical measurement procedures
Department of Laboratory Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4272-0001
Department of Clinical Biochemistry, PathWest Laboratory Medicine, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, Western Australia.
Faculty of Medical Technology, Hanoi Medical University, Vietnam;Department of Clinical Biochemistry, National Children’s Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Flinders University International Centre for Point-of-Care Testing, Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia.
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: Annals of Clinical Biochemistry, ISSN 0004-5632, E-ISSN 1758-1001, Vol. 61, no 1, p. 3-7Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Reporting a measurement procedure and its analytical performance following method evaluation in a peer-reviewed journal is an important means for clinical laboratory practitioners to share their findings. It also represents an important source of evidence base to help others make informed decisions about their practice. At present, there are significant variations in the information reported in laboratory medicine journal publications describing the analytical performance of measurement procedures. These variations also challenge authors, readers, reviewers and editors in deciding the quality of a submitted manuscript. The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Working Group on Method Evaluation Protocols (IFCC WG-MEP) developed a checklist and recommends its adoption to enable a consistent approach to reporting method evaluation and analytical performance characteristics of measurement procedures in laboratory medicine journals. It is envisioned that the LEAP checklist will improve the standardisation of journal publications describing method evaluation and analytical performance characteristics, improving the quality of the evidence base that is relied upon by practitioners.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sage Publications, 2024. Vol. 61, no 1, p. 3-7
Keywords [en]
Emerging technology(ies); method validation; method verification
National Category
Software Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-201884DOI: 10.1177/00045632231206029PubMedID: 37838926Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85174199923OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-201884DiVA, id: diva2:1846748
Available from: 2024-03-25 Created: 2024-03-25 Last updated: 2025-08-15

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Theodorsson, Elvar

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Loh, Tze PingTheodorsson, ElvarGreaves, Ronda F
By organisation
Division of Clinical Chemistry and PharmacologyFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences
In the same journal
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry
Software Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 76 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf