liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Characteristics of a First-Generation X-Ray System
Maastricht University, Netherlands.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-7104-7127
Maastricht University, Netherlands.
Maastricht University, Netherlands.
Maastricht University, Netherlands.
Vise andre og tillknytning
2011 (engelsk)Inngår i: Radiology, ISSN 0033-8419, E-ISSN 1527-1315, Vol. 259, nr 2, s. 534-539Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose: To compare the antiquated x-ray system of Hoffmans and van Kleef (circa 1896) with modern x-ray equipment in terms of radiation dose, x-ray beam properties, image quality, and electrical parameters. Materials and Methods: The antiquated x-ray system consisted of a Ruhmkorff inductor, battery, and Crookes tube. The radiation dose rate, x-ray beam properties, and electrical characteristics of this system were determined. A modern computed radiography plate was used to compare images of a hand specimen obtained by using the antiquated system with images obtained by using the modern system. Results: A peak voltage of 73 kV was obtained with an 8-V battery. With Crookes tube number 9, the half-value layer of the generated x-rays was 0.56 mm Al. Pinhole images showed that the x-rays originated from an extended area of the glass wall, causing image blurring. When measured on the skin of a hand specimen, the radiation dose of the antiquated system was about 10 times greater than that of the modern system for the same detector signal. The estimated skin dose was about 74 mGy for the antiquated system and 0.05 mGy for the modern system. The corresponding exposure times were 90 minutes and 21 msec. Conclusion: Radiation dose and exposure time of the antiquated system were greater than those of the modern system by about three and five orders of magnitude, respectively. Images of the hand specimen obtained with the antiquated system were severely blurred but were still awe inspiring, considering the simplicity of the system. (C)RSNA, 2011

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) , 2011. Vol. 259, nr 2, s. 534-539
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-141464DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11101899ISI: 000289667300028PubMedID: 21411750OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-141464DiVA, id: diva2:1145752
Merknad

Funding Agencies|Bayer Schering Pharma; Boston Scientific; GE Healthcare

Tilgjengelig fra: 2017-09-29 Laget: 2017-09-29 Sist oppdatert: 2017-10-09

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstPubMed

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Kemerink, MartijnKemerink, Gerrit J.
I samme tidsskrift
Radiology

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 56 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf