liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Key occupational stressors in the ED: an international comparison
Royal Brisbane and Womens Hosp, Australia; Queensland Univ Technol, Australia; Queensland Univ Technol, Australia.
Univ Sunshine Coast, Australia.
Princess Alexandra Hosp, Australia; Univ Queensland, Australia.
Univ Goteborgs, Sweden.
Vise andre og tillknytning
2020 (engelsk)Inngår i: Emergency Medicine Journal, ISSN 1472-0205, E-ISSN 1472-0213, Vol. 37, nr 2, s. 106-+Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Background The ED Stressor Scale outlines 15 stressors that are of importance for ED staff. Limited research has identified how commonly such stressors occur, or whether such factors are perceived with similar importance across different hospitals. This study sought to examine the frequency or perceived severity of these 15 stressors using a multicentre cohort of emergency clinicians (nurses and physicians) in EDs in two countries (Australia and Sweden). Method This was a cross-sectional survey of staff working in eight hospitals in Australia and Sweden. Data were collected between July 2016 and June 2017 (depending on local site approvals) via a printed survey incorporating the 15-item ED stressor scale. The median stress score for each item and the frequency of experiencing each event was reported. Results Events causing most distress include heavy workload, death or sexual abuse of a child, inability to provide optimum care and workplace violence. Stressors reported most frequently include dealing with high acuity patients, heavy workload and crowding. Violence, workload, inability to provide optimal care, poor professional relations, poor professional development and dealing with high-acuity patients were reported more commonly by Australian staff. Swedish respondents reported more frequent exposure to mass casualty incidents, crisis management and administrative concerns. Conclusions Workload, inability to provide optimal care, workplace violence and death or sexual abuse of a child were consistently reported as the most distressing events across sites. The frequency with which these occurred differed in Australia and Sweden, likely due to differences in the healthcare systems.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP , 2020. Vol. 37, nr 2, s. 106-+
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-164386DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2018-208390ISI: 000514645100011PubMedID: 31551289OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-164386DiVA, id: diva2:1415853
Merknad

Funding Agencies|Emergency Medicine Foundation [EMSS-410R22-2014]

Tilgjengelig fra: 2020-03-20 Laget: 2020-03-20 Sist oppdatert: 2020-03-20

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstPubMed

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Wilhelms, Daniel
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Emergency Medicine Journal

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 79 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf