liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Urban nuclear reactors and the security theatre: the making of atomic heritage in Chicago, Moscow and Stockholm
Linköpings universitet, Institutionen för tema, Tema teknik och social förändring. Linköpings universitet, Filosofiska fakulteten. (Critical Nuclear Studies)ORCID-id: 0000-0002-0553-1295
Stockholms universitet.
Kingston university, London.
2019 (engelsk)Inngår i: Securing urban heritage: agents, access, and securitization / [ed] Heike Oevermann, Eszter Gantner, London: Routledge, 2019, s. 111-129Kapittel i bok, del av antologi (Fagfellevurdert)
Abstract [en]

During and immediately after the Second World War, physicists and engineers in several countries worked intensively and in competition to develop nuclear weapons and to control the chain reaction creating nuclear energy. An experience of urgency and a sense of revolutionary future promise permeated the activities and largely outweighed the risks as they were calculated at the time. As a result, small experimental reactors were built at research institutes or universities relatively close to city centres and densely populated areas—the key localization factor being the physicists’ own geography. This chapter focuses on three of the early pioneering urban reactors, located in Chicago, Moscow, and Stockholm, which were all symbols of national prowess as humanity was entering the nuclear age, and later became objects of heritage processes. We scrutinize the early operations as well as the making of atomic heritage, through the conceptual lens of the ‘security theatre’. The concept highlights the relationship between, on the one hand, calculable risk and security, and on the other hand, perceived risk and security. We argue that, overall, the security theatre displays reversed characteristics if comparing the establishment period with the processes of heritagization in the way that the calculable risks were initially high but downplayed, while subsequently being low but exaggerated. This tension between calculable risk and perceived risk, we suggest, forms the key to the attraction of contemporary atomic heritage. This chapter is based on historic and contemporary written and visual sources, together with interviews and on-site visits.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
London: Routledge, 2019. s. 111-129
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-171163Libris ID: 9pnmwk2x7ffpsqw9ISBN: 9780367148430 (tryckt)ISBN: 9780429053559 (digital)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-171163DiVA, id: diva2:1499151
Forskningsfinansiär
Riksbankens Jubileumsfond, P16-0684Tilgjengelig fra: 2020-11-06 Laget: 2020-11-06 Sist oppdatert: 2026-04-22bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

https://libris.kb.se/bib/9pnmwk2x7ffpsqw9

Person

Storm, Anna

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Storm, Anna
Av organisasjonen

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric

isbn
urn-nbn
Totalt: 366 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf