liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Quantile connectedness and the determinants between FinTech and traditional financial institutions: Evidence from China
Hunan Univ, Peoples R China; Hunan Prov Key Lab Philosophy & Social Sci Ind Dig, Peoples R China.
Hunan Univ, Peoples R China.
Hunan Univ, Peoples R China; Hunan Prov Key Lab Philosophy & Social Sci Ind Dig, Peoples R China.
Hunan Univ, Peoples R China; Hunan Prov Key Lab Philosophy & Social Sci Ind Dig, Peoples R China.
Vise andre og tillknytning
2023 (engelsk)Inngår i: Global Finance Journal, ISSN 1044-0283, E-ISSN 1873-5665, Vol. 58, artikkel-id 100906Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

This study examines the connectedness and risk spillovers between Chinese FinTech and traditional financial institutions by using quantile-based vector autoregression (QVAR) networks. Specifically, by using daily data from January 2014 to June 2022, we focus on system-, sector-, and institution-level quantile connectedness characteristics, with the following findings. At the system level, the QVAR networks linking FinTech and traditional financial institutions are more connected at the extreme quantiles than at the median quantile. At the sector level, banks, real estate firms, and FinTech sectors act as net risk receivers, whereas securities and insurers act as net risk emitters. At the institutional level, risk transmission and reception of institutions significantly increase when market conditions rapidly change. We also investigate the determinants of quantile connectedness by using an exponential random graph model and find that (i) across different quantiles, the book-to-market and return on equity of institutions have a positive impact on their risk spillovers; (ii) at the extreme quantiles, the book-to-market is more pronounced than the return on equity; and (iii) at the median quantile, banks and FinTech institutions are more connected than insurers, real estate firms, securities, and other financials.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
ELSEVIER , 2023. Vol. 58, artikkel-id 100906
Emneord [en]
FinTech; Financial institutions; Quantile connectedness; Determinants; Risk spillovers; Exponential random graph model
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-200063DOI: 10.1016/j.gfj.2023.100906ISI: 001114408200001OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-200063DiVA, id: diva2:1827567
Merknad

Funding Agencies|National Natural Science Foundation of China [72271087, 71871088, 71971079]; National Social Science Foundation of China [21ZDA114]; Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [21JJ20019]; Huxiang Youth Talent Support Program

Tilgjengelig fra: 2024-01-15 Laget: 2024-01-15 Sist oppdatert: 2024-01-15

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekst

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Uddin, Gazi Salah
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Global Finance Journal

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 52 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf