liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Predictors of anastomotic leak and conduit necrosis after oesophagectomy: Results from the oesophago-gastric anastomosis audit (OGAA)
Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK .
Region Östergötland, Centrum för kirurgi, ortopedi och cancervård, Kirurgiska kliniken US. (Oesophago-Gastric Anastomotic Audit (OGAA) Collaborative 2 , Writing Committee, Data Analysis, Steering Committee, National Leads, Site Leads, Collaborators)
2024 (engelsk)Inngår i: European Journal of Surgical Oncology, ISSN 0748-7983, E-ISSN 1532-2157, Vol. 50, nr 6, artikkel-id 107983Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Both anastomotic leak (AL) and conduit necrosis (CN) after oesophagectomy are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Therefore, the identification of preoperative, modifiable risk factors is desirable. The aim of this study was to generate a risk scoring model for AL and CN after oesophagectomy.

Methods: Patients undergoing curative resection for oesophageal cancer were identified from the international Oesophagogastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA) from April 2018-December 2018. Definitions for AL and CN were those set out by the Oesophageal Complications Consensus Group. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for both AL and CN. A risk score was then produced for both AL and CN using the derivation set, then internally validated using the validation set.

Results: This study included 2247 oesophagectomies across 137 hospitals in 41 countries. The AL rate was 14.2% and CN rate was 2.7%. Preoperative factors that were independent predictors of AL were cardiovascular comorbidity and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The risk scoring model showed insufficient predictive ability in internal validation (area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve [AUROC] = 0.618). Preoperative factors that were independent predictors of CN were: body mass index, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, previous myocardial infarction and smoking history. These were converted into a risk-scoring model and internally validated using the validation set with an AUROC of 0.775.

Conclusion: Despite a large dataset, AL proves difficult to predict using preoperative factors. The risk-scoring model for CN provides an internally validated tool to estimate a patient's risk preoperatively.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Elsevier, 2024. Vol. 50, nr 6, artikkel-id 107983
Emneord [en]
Anastomotic leak; Conduit necrosis; Oesophagectomy; Outcomes
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-211978DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.107983ISI: 001230573200001PubMedID: 38613995Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85190281598OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-211978DiVA, id: diva2:1941602
Tilgjengelig fra: 2025-03-01 Laget: 2025-03-01 Sist oppdatert: 2025-03-01

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstPubMedScopus

Person

Halldestam, Ingvar

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Halldestam, Ingvar
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
European Journal of Surgical Oncology

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 31 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf