liu.seSök publikationer i DiVA
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The clinical utility of anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies and the challenges of their determination.
Inova Diagnostics, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.
University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Linköpings universitet, Institutionen för klinisk och experimentell medicin, Avdelningen för neuro- och inflammationsvetenskap. Linköpings universitet, Medicinska fakulteten. Region Östergötland, Hjärt- och Medicincentrum, Reumatologiska kliniken i Östergötland.ORCID-id: 0000-0003-0900-2048
Inova Diagnostics, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.
Visa övriga samt affilieringar
2018 (Engelska)Ingår i: JIM - Journal of Immunological Methods, ISSN 0022-1759, E-ISSN 1872-7905, Vol. 459, s. 11-19Artikel, forskningsöversikt (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

Autoantibodies against double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) were first described >60 years ago and although they are still one of the most clinically relevant autoantibodies, test results may be more challenging to interpret compared to other autoantibody tests. They are a serological hallmark of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and are included in both the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) classification criteria for SLE. Furthermore, anti-dsDNA antibodies (a-dsDNA) have been shown to associate with SLE disease activity and coincide with renal involvement. Given their importance and long history, one might assume that immunological tests for a-dsDNA are standardized and give comparable results. However, even though there has been an international reference standard serum (the WHO Wo/80), different methods for the detection of a-dsDNA and tests from different manufacturers give different results for the same samples. This disparity is due to the diversity of possible antibodies generated to this biochemically complex antigen, which may have different clinical associations. The goal of this review is to summarize the current knowledge regarding the clinical associations with a-dsDNA, highlight challenges in a-dsDNA testing, and elucidate the reasons for discrepant results between methods or manufacturers.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Elsevier, 2018. Vol. 459, s. 11-19
Nyckelord [en]
Autoantibodies, SLE, dsDNA
Nationell ämneskategori
Klinisk medicin
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-149017DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2018.05.014ISI: 000439538000002PubMedID: 29807021OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-149017DiVA, id: diva2:1223412
Tillgänglig från: 2018-06-25 Skapad: 2018-06-25 Senast uppdaterad: 2025-02-18

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextPubMed

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Sjöwall, Christopher
Av organisationen
Avdelningen för neuro- och inflammationsvetenskapMedicinska fakultetenReumatologiska kliniken i Östergötland
I samma tidskrift
JIM - Journal of Immunological Methods
Klinisk medicin

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 171 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf