liu.seSök publikationer i DiVA
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Key occupational stressors in the ED: an international comparison
Royal Brisbane and Womens Hosp, Australia; Queensland Univ Technol, Australia; Queensland Univ Technol, Australia.
Univ Sunshine Coast, Australia.
Princess Alexandra Hosp, Australia; Univ Queensland, Australia.
Univ Goteborgs, Sweden.
Visa övriga samt affilieringar
2020 (Engelska)Ingår i: Emergency Medicine Journal, ISSN 1472-0205, E-ISSN 1472-0213, Vol. 37, nr 2, s. 106-+Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

Background The ED Stressor Scale outlines 15 stressors that are of importance for ED staff. Limited research has identified how commonly such stressors occur, or whether such factors are perceived with similar importance across different hospitals. This study sought to examine the frequency or perceived severity of these 15 stressors using a multicentre cohort of emergency clinicians (nurses and physicians) in EDs in two countries (Australia and Sweden). Method This was a cross-sectional survey of staff working in eight hospitals in Australia and Sweden. Data were collected between July 2016 and June 2017 (depending on local site approvals) via a printed survey incorporating the 15-item ED stressor scale. The median stress score for each item and the frequency of experiencing each event was reported. Results Events causing most distress include heavy workload, death or sexual abuse of a child, inability to provide optimum care and workplace violence. Stressors reported most frequently include dealing with high acuity patients, heavy workload and crowding. Violence, workload, inability to provide optimal care, poor professional relations, poor professional development and dealing with high-acuity patients were reported more commonly by Australian staff. Swedish respondents reported more frequent exposure to mass casualty incidents, crisis management and administrative concerns. Conclusions Workload, inability to provide optimal care, workplace violence and death or sexual abuse of a child were consistently reported as the most distressing events across sites. The frequency with which these occurred differed in Australia and Sweden, likely due to differences in the healthcare systems.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP , 2020. Vol. 37, nr 2, s. 106-+
Nationell ämneskategori
Hälso- och sjukvårdsorganisation, hälsopolitik och hälsoekonomi
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-164386DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2018-208390ISI: 000514645100011PubMedID: 31551289OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-164386DiVA, id: diva2:1415853
Anmärkning

Funding Agencies|Emergency Medicine Foundation [EMSS-410R22-2014]

Tillgänglig från: 2020-03-20 Skapad: 2020-03-20 Senast uppdaterad: 2020-03-20

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextPubMed

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Wilhelms, Daniel
Av organisationen
Avdelningen för läkemedelsforskningMedicinska fakultetenAkutkliniken i Linköping
I samma tidskrift
Emergency Medicine Journal
Hälso- och sjukvårdsorganisation, hälsopolitik och hälsoekonomi

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 80 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf