liu.seSök publikationer i DiVA
Driftstörningar
Det förekommer återkommande driftstörningar på några av sök-portalerna på grund av hög belastning. Vi arbetar på att lösa problemet, ni kan tillfälligt mötas av ett felmeddelande.
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Reinforced versus standard stapler transection on postoperative pancreatic fistula in distal pancreatectomy: multicentre randomized clinical trial
Univ Gothenburg, Sweden.
Karolinska Univ Hosp, Sweden.
Univ Gothenburg, Sweden.
Linköpings universitet, Institutionen för biomedicinska och kliniska vetenskaper, Avdelningen för kirurgi, ortopedi och onkologi. Linköpings universitet, Medicinska fakulteten. Region Östergötland, Centrum för kirurgi, ortopedi och cancervård, Kirurgiska kliniken US.
Visa övriga samt affilieringar
2021 (Engelska)Ingår i: British Journal of Surgery, ISSN 0007-1323, E-ISSN 1365-2168, Vol. 108, nr 3, s. 265-270Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Postoperative pancreatic fistula is the leading cause of morbidity after distal pancreatectomy. Strategies investigated to reduce the incidence have been disappointing. Recent data showed a reduction in postoperative pancreatic fistula with the use of synthetic mesh reinforcement of the staple line. Methods: An RCT was conducted between May 2014 and February 2016 at four tertiary referral centres in Sweden. Patients scheduled for distal pancreatectomy were eligible. Enrolled patients were randomized during surgery to stapler transection with biological reinforcement or standard stapler transection. Patients were blinded to the allocation. The primary endpoint was the development of any postoperative pancreatic fistula. Secondary endpoints included morbidity, mortality, and duration of hospital stay. Results: Some 107 patients were randomized and 106 included in an intention-to-treat analysis (56 in reinforced stapling group, 50 in standard stapling group). No difference was demonstrated in terms of clinically relevant fistulas (grade B and C): 6 of 56 (11 per cent) with reinforced stapling versus 8 of 50 (16 per cent) with standard stapling (P = 0.332). There was no difference between groups in overall postoperative complications: 45 (80 per cent) and 39 (78 per cent) in reinforced and standard stapling groups respectively (P = 0.765). Duration of hospital stay was comparable: median 8 (range 2-35) and 9 (2-114) days respectively (P = 0.541). Conclusion: Biodegradable stapler reinforcement at the transection line of the pancreas did not reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula compared with regular stapler transection in distal pancreatectomy.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
OXFORD UNIV PRESS , 2021. Vol. 108, nr 3, s. 265-270
Nationell ämneskategori
Kirurgi
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-175802DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znaa113ISI: 000642298200034PubMedID: 33793753OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-175802DiVA, id: diva2:1556829
Tillgänglig från: 2021-05-24 Skapad: 2021-05-24 Senast uppdaterad: 2021-05-24

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextPubMed

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Björnsson, BergthorSandström, Per
Av organisationen
Avdelningen för kirurgi, ortopedi och onkologiMedicinska fakultetenKirurgiska kliniken US
I samma tidskrift
British Journal of Surgery
Kirurgi

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 66 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf