liu.seSök publikationer i DiVA
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Anorectal Function After Ileo-Rectal Anastomosis Is Better than Pelvic Pouch in Selected Ulcerative Colitis Patients
Linköpings universitet, Institutionen för biomedicinska och kliniska vetenskaper, Avdelningen för kirurgi, ortopedi och onkologi. Linköpings universitet, Medicinska fakulteten. Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Egypt.ORCID-id: 0000-0003-0294-4032
Linköpings universitet, Institutionen för klinisk och experimentell medicin. Linköpings universitet, Medicinska fakulteten. Region Östergötland, Centrum för kirurgi, ortopedi och cancervård, Kirurgiska kliniken US.
Linköpings universitet, Institutionen för klinisk och experimentell medicin. Linköpings universitet, Medicinska fakulteten. Region Östergötland, Centrum för kirurgi, ortopedi och cancervård, Kirurgiska kliniken US.
Linköpings universitet, Institutionen för biomedicinska och kliniska vetenskaper, Avdelningen för kirurgi, ortopedi och onkologi. Linköpings universitet, Medicinska fakulteten. Department of Surgery, Ryhov County Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden.ORCID-id: 0000-0001-6808-371X
Visa övriga samt affilieringar
2020 (Engelska)Ingår i: Digestive Diseases and Sciences, ISSN 0163-2116, E-ISSN 1573-2568, s. 250-259Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: With a lifelong perspective, 12% of ulcerative colitis patients will need a colectomy. Further reconstruction via ileo-rectal anastomosis or pouch can be affected by patients' perspective of their quality of life after surgery.

AIM: To assess the function and quality of life after restorative procedures with either ileo-rectal anastomosis or ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in relation to the inflammatory activity on endoscopy and in biopsies.

METHOD: A total of 143 UC patients operated with subtotal colectomy and ileo-rectal anastomosis or pouches between 1992 and 2006 at Linköping University Hospital were invited to participate. Those who completed the validated questionnaires (Öresland score, SF-36, Short Health Scale) were offered an endoscopic evaluation including multiple biopsies. Associations between anorectal function and quality of life with type of restorative procedure and severity of endoscopic and histopathologic grading of inflammation were evaluated.

RESULTS: Some 77 (53.9%) eligible patients completed questionnaires, of these 68 (88.3%) underwent endoscopic evaluation after a median follow-up of 12.5 (range 3.5-19.4) years after restorative procedure. Patients with ileo-rectal anastomosis reported better overall Öresland score: median = 3 (IQR 2-5) for ileo-rectal anastomosis (n = 38) and 10 (IQR 5-15) for pouch patients (n = 39) (p < 0.001). Anorectal function (Öresland score) and endoscopic findings (Baron-Ginsberg score) were positively correlated in pouch patients (tau: 0.28, p = 0.006).

CONCLUSION: Patients operated with ileo-rectal anastomosis reported better continence compared to pouches. Minor differences were noted regarding the quality of life. Ileo-rectal anastomosis is a valid option for properly selected ulcerative colitis patients if strict postoperative endoscopic surveillance is carried out.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Springer-Verlag New York, 2020. s. 250-259
Nyckelord [en]
Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, Ileo-rectal anastomosis, Quality of life, Ulcerative colitis
Nationell ämneskategori
Kirurgi Gastroenterologi
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-160247DOI: 10.1007/s10620-019-05757-6PubMedID: 31372911Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85070104240OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-160247DiVA, id: diva2:1351059
Tillgänglig från: 2019-09-13 Skapad: 2019-09-13 Senast uppdaterad: 2021-12-29Bibliografiskt granskad
Ingår i avhandling
1. Cancer and reconstructive surgery in Inflammatory bowel disease
Öppna denna publikation i ny flik eller fönster >>Cancer and reconstructive surgery in Inflammatory bowel disease
2019 (Engelska)Doktorsavhandling, sammanläggning (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
Abstract [en]

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects the colon. According to the literature, some thirty percent of UC patients may require a subtotal colectomy and ileostomy due to failure of medical treatment, acute toxic colitis or dysplasia/cancer diagnosis. Some patients choose to get continence restored with either an ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) or an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). Worldwide most surgeons prefer an IPAA to an IRA, despite reports of pouchitis, impaired fertility and fecundity. Fear of recurring proctitis and fear of rectal cancer in the remaining rectum is contributing to the choice of an IPAA. Little is known regarding the outcomes of IRA compared with IPAA in UC patients. We aimed to investigate the anorectal function, quality of life (QoL), risk of failure and rectal cancer in patients with UC restored with IRA and IPAA respectively.

Methods: Data about all Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients was obtained from the Swedish National Patient Register (NPR) between 1964-2014 and in one study from the Linköping University Hospital medical records 2006-2012. Patients who developed cancer were identified from the Swedish National Cancer Register. We investigated the risk of cancer and inflammation, functional outcome and failure as well as the quality of life for IRA and IPAA patients. Investigation of risk for cancer in IRA and IPAA compared with the background population was performed using survival analytic techniques: uni-and multivariate regression, Kaplan Meier curves and standardized incidence ratio.

Results: Twelve percent (7,889 /63,795) of UC patients required colectomy according to the NPR. The relative risk for rectal cancer among patients with an IRA was increased (SIR 8.7). However, the absolute risk was 1.8% after a mean follow up of 8.6 years and the cumulative risk 10- and 20-years after IRA was 1.6% and 5.6%, respectively. Risk factors for rectal cancer were primary sclerosing cholangitis in patients with an IRA (hazard ratio 6.12), and severe dysplasia or cancer of the colon prior to subtotal colectomy in patients with a diverted rectum in place (hazard ratio 3.67). Regarding IPAA, the relative risk to develop rectal cancer was (SIR 0.4) compared with the background population and the absolute risk was only 0.06% after a mean of 12.2 years of follow up. Among patients operated at the Linköping University Hospital: IRA patients reported better overall continence according to the Öresland score with in median3 (IQR 2–5) for IRA (n=38) and 10 (IQR 5–15) for IPAA (n=39, p<0.001). There were no major differences regarding the QoL. According to the NPR, after a median follow up of 12.4 years failure occurred in 265(32%) out of 1112 patients, of which 76 were secondarily reconstructed with an IPAA. Failure of the IPAA occurred in 103 (6%) patients with primary and in 6 (8%) patients after secondary IPAA (log-rank p=0.38).

Conclusion: IRA is a safe restorative procedure for selected UC patients. Patients should be aware of the annual postoperative endoscopic evaluation with biopsies as well as the need to the use of local anti-inflammatory preparations. However, IRA should not be offered for UC patients with an associated primary sclerosing cholangitis diagnosis due to the increased risk to develop rectal cancer in their rectal mucosa. In such case, IPAA is probably the treatment of choice.  

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press, 2019. s. 116
Serie
Linköping University Medical Dissertations, ISSN 0345-0082 ; 1670
Nyckelord
Inflammatory bowel disease, Colorectal cancer, IRA, IPAA, Primary sclerosing cholangitis
Nationell ämneskategori
Gastroenterologi
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-161507 (URN)10.3384/diss.diva-161507 (DOI)9789176851098 (ISBN)
Disputation
2019-12-19, Hugo Theorell sal, Campus US, Linköpings Universitet, Linköping, 09:00 (Engelska)
Opponent
Handledare
Tillgänglig från: 2019-11-04 Skapad: 2019-11-04 Senast uppdaterad: 2021-12-29Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

fulltext(2128 kB)499 nedladdningar
Filinformation
Filnamn FULLTEXT01.pdfFilstorlek 2128 kBChecksumma SHA-512
3a4d537369a6367f97cbacd3c387bf08fca4cf836788dc34993a937715097e32bcf821070b04892b285cbfe8433aa914938bc3fd1220de3ce7e48d8797e6ef38
Typ fulltextMimetyp application/pdf

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextPubMedScopus

Person

Abdalla, MaieNorblad, RickardLanderholm, KalleAndersson, PeterSöderholm, Johan D.Andersson, RolandMyrelid, Pär

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Abdalla, MaieNorblad, RickardOlsson, MalinLanderholm, KalleAndersson, PeterSöderholm, Johan D.Andersson, RolandMyrelid, Pär
Av organisationen
Avdelningen för kirurgi, ortopedi och onkologiMedicinska fakultetenInstitutionen för klinisk och experimentell medicinKirurgiska kliniken USKirurgiska kliniken ViNKatastrofmedicinskt centrum
I samma tidskrift
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
KirurgiGastroenterologi

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Totalt: 501 nedladdningar
Antalet nedladdningar är summan av nedladdningar för alla fulltexter. Det kan inkludera t.ex tidigare versioner som nu inte längre är tillgängliga.

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 983 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf