Vagal Nerve Stimulation in Epilepsy: Experiences of Participants with Cognitive DeficitsShow others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, ISSN 1176-6328, E-ISSN 1178-2021, NEUROPSYCHIATRIC DISEASE AND TREATMENT, Vol. 16, p. 1181-1188
Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to examine patients experiences of vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) with a special interest in patients with cognitive deficit (CD). Materials and Methods: An open, retrospective study was conducted on 82 patients with pharmacoresistant epilepsy, who were treated with VNS for at least 10 months. Based on the inability to live independently, they were divided into two groups: patients with cognitive deficit (CD group) and patients without cognitive deficit (non-CD group). A specially designed questionnaire was used for semi-structured interviews about patients experiences of VNS treatment. Results: Approximately one-third described a continuous reduction of seizure frequency of 50% or more and were regarded as responders. Fewer subjects in the CD group were responders than in the non-CD group. Approximately one-third of all subjects had no positive effect of VNS treatment. More CD patients described additional improvements and the most common were milder seizures and improved alertness. The most commonly reported adverse effect was hoarseness. Discussion: VNS treatment in patients without CD had better effect on seizure frequency reduction than in patients with CD, but many patients with CD reported other benefits from the treatment.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Auckland, New Zealand: DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD , 2020. Vol. 16, p. 1181-1188
Keywords [en]
epilepsy; vagus nerve stimulation; cognitive deficit; cognitive dysfunction
National Category
Otorhinolaryngology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-165980DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S241716ISI: 000530880000001PubMedID: 32440133OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-165980DiVA, id: diva2:1434884
2020-06-042020-06-042021-05-05Bibliographically approved