liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Potential valorisation of shredder fines: Towards integrated processes formaterial upgrading and resource recovery
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Environmental Technology and Management. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4810-2319
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Environmental Technology and Management. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Business Administration. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2787-8417
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Environmental Technology and Management. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0157-6573
2020 (English)In: Resources, Conservation and Recycling, ISSN 0921-3449, E-ISSN 1879-0658, Vol. 154, article id 104590Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The lack of process development based on a comprehensive understanding of the material characteristics and the marketability of recoverables is the primary reason why the valorisation of shredder fines has not been realised in practice. In response, a systematic approach was undertaken consisting of 1) strategic sampling and material characterisation, 2) establishing gate and regulatory requirements of potential valorisation applications, and 3) initial feasibility assessment of the selected applications, to guide future research.

The material was sampled over ten weeks in order to obtain both average values and variations of the physical and chemical composition. Thus weekly, primary fractions and sieved fractions ZA (7.10–5.00 mm), ZB (5.00–3.35 mm), ZC (3.35–2.00 mm), ZD (2.00–0.25 mm), and ZE (0.25–0.063 mm) were prepared, and analysed, and benchmarked against the requirements pertaining to five potential applications. The mercury and aluminium concentrations are the biggest challenge in copper smelting and only ZA and ZB show significant potential. Energy recovery is limited to ZA, ZB, and ZC, provided the chlorine and metals concentrations are decreased. Regarding the recovery as bulk-material in construction, the reduction of the metal content would likely be a pre-requisite.

The utilisation of fines in the individual applications would either leave a significant amount of fines un-valorised or overlook the recovery of valuable resources. The upgrading of the material to suit the different applications would also require addressing multiple material constraints simultaneously. Therefore, realising the full resource potential of shredder fines would require the integration of different upgrading and recovery processes.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2020. Vol. 154, article id 104590
Keywords [en]
Shredder fines, Valorisation, Upgrading, Recovery, Characterisation, User requirements
National Category
Other Environmental Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-167036DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104590ISI: 000540553600036Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85075936986OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-167036DiVA, id: diva2:1447006
Projects
Mistra Closing the loop II
Funder
Mistra - The Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research
Note

Funding agencies: Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research (Mistra)Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research

Available from: 2020-06-25 Created: 2020-06-25 Last updated: 2021-09-12Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Can we go circular?: On the multifaceted challenges of facilitating shredder fines valorisation in the Swedish context
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Can we go circular?: On the multifaceted challenges of facilitating shredder fines valorisation in the Swedish context
2020 (English)Licentiate thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

In concomitance with the growing developments around the circular economy concept in the region, the resource recovery and recycling of industrial production residues is increasingly being envisaged in the European Union and its member states. The role of the recycling industry has become ever important in this context. The shredding industry is based on shredding discarded products such as end-of-life vehicles, and municipal white goods, and subsequent retrieval of (primarily) metals. Shredder fines (or fines) is a heterogeneous fine-granular production residue of this industry, which is currently disposed of. Shredder fines presents, and will continue to do so in the foreseeable future, several challenges that need to be addressed. It creates a disposal problem given the shrinking landfill availability and incurs handling costs to the shredding industry. Furthermore, it reduces our resources efficiency in general.

This thesis aims to contribute knowledge on the challenges of facilitating the valorisation of shredder fines in the context of Sweden. In doing so, the current situation concerning fines and its management was investigated by addressing the research questions; 1) What is the resource potential of fines generated at the studied shredding plant, and 2) Why is the current disposal-oriented management of shredder fines sustained in Sweden. There, a systems perspective was employed, where the research questions were addressed on the material, actor, and institution levels, based on three scientific articles, which are appended.

The studied material carries a certain amount of potentially recoverable resources, nevertheless shows a significant need for upgrading pertaining to the user requirements and regulatory standards of different recovery applications. The full recovery of fines requires integrated processes that could simultaneously harness these resource opportunities and resolve the material constraints. When it comes to the current practice of managing fines in Sweden, the utilisation in landfill covering offers the shredding companies a secure outlet for the material, given it is a well-established practice that has evolved over decades of operations and there is still a significant demand for landfill cover materials. Additionally, it provides shredding companies with a legislatively-compliant low-cost disposal option for managing fines. On the other hand, the complex materiality, lack of marketability of secondary raw materials (SRMs), and unfavourable governmental regulation of waste recovery create strategic disincentives for shredding companies in opting for fines valorisation.

Fines valorisation calls for change in the well-established current practice of utilising the material in landfill covering. Thus, drastic policy measures such as phasing out landfilling and mandating resource recovery and recycling of fines are required to remove the incentives for fines disposal and compel the shredding industry to seek valorisation alternatives for its management. In order to ensure long-term sustenance, applications based on fines valorisation need favourable and more predictable circumstances and settings on different societal levels. There, secure outlets for potential fines-derived SRMs is one of the essential elements. Governmental interventions to create demand and alleviate valorisation investments via market and financial instruments play a significant role in that regard. The other primary requirement to facilitate fines valorisation in the long term is to set clear market and regulatory playing rules. Established supply and demand structures would enable clear pricing mechanisms for fines-derived SRMs and accurate economic assessments of fines valorisation, thus reducing the investment risk for shredding companies. On the other hand, clear regulatory standards and favourable regulatory practices would reduce the uncertainty of the realisation of valorisation applications and gain trust among actors.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press, 2020. p. 55
Series
Linköping Studies in Science and Technology. Licentiate Thesis, ISSN 0280-7971 ; 1864
National Category
Environmental Management
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-170221 (URN)10.3384/lic.diva-170221 (DOI)9789179299323 (ISBN)
Presentation
2020-10-21, Online through Zoom (contact maria.eriksson@liu.se) and ACAS, A Building, Campus Valla, Linköping, 10:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Funder
Mistra - The Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research
Available from: 2020-10-02 Created: 2020-10-02 Last updated: 2025-02-10Bibliographically approved
2. Valorisation of heterogeneous industrial residues towards a circular economy: A systems-oriented investigation on how to facilitate shredder fines valorisation in the Swedish context
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Valorisation of heterogeneous industrial residues towards a circular economy: A systems-oriented investigation on how to facilitate shredder fines valorisation in the Swedish context
2021 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

In the context of circular economy in the European region the role of the recycling industry has become ever important. Shredder fines (or fines) is a heterogeneous fine-granular production residue of the shredding industry, and is currently disposed of. Shredder fines presents a disposal problem and incurs handling costs to the shredding industry. More importantly, its disposal reduces the resources efficiency of our society. This thesis aims to contribute systems-oriented knowledge to facilitate the valorisation of shredder fines in the Swedish context. In doing so, it contributes to two knowledge. Knowledge area one portrays the current picture concerning fines management in terms of the underlying factors of the current practice of fines management and the market prospects for secondary construction aggregates. Knowledge area two showcases the potential approach to initiate process development in terms of assessments of the resource potential of fines and the environmental impact of fines-valorisation. 

The findings of knowledge area one show that the studied shredding company is more inclined towards continuing on the current disposal-oriented management of fines. That is because of both incentives for utilising fines as landfill cover materials and disincentives for valorising fines, created by various policy, market, and organisational factors. On the other hand, a significant need exists to improve the prospects of secondary aggregates in the construction aggregates market. Currently, the market is chiefly characterised by processes and underlying structures that sustain dominant primary aggregates utilisation, whereas secondary aggregates utilisation is situational and driven by different supply chain actors due to different individual reasons.

The findings of knowledge area two show that process development for fines valorisation has several technical and environmental challenges. The resource potential assessment of the fines shows that the initial technical feasibility of fines valorisation is considerable, however different resource recovery strategies would require different levels of processes for upgrading and resource recovery. The ex-ante life cycle assessment of fines valorisation shows that potential fines valorisation is environmentally more promising compared to landfill-related disposal, however, different resource recovery strategies would create different levels of environmental impacts and present different needs for improvements.

Facilitating fines valorisation calls for different measures on the institution and actor levels. Drastic policy measures are required to remove the incentives for the disposal of the material and compel shredding companies to seek valorisation alternatives. In order to ensure long-term sustenance of fines valorisation, fines-derived secondary raw materials need secure outlets and clear market and regulatory playing rules for their generation and application. Additionally, environmentally feasible and cost effective upgrading and resource recovery processes have to be developed.

The origin of circular economy is grounded in restoring the environmental balance and reducing the throughput of natural resources in anthropogenic systems. Nevertheless, the current conceptualisation of circular economy is predominantly focusing on the economic progress, which somewhat promotes “business as usual”. This thesis attempts to reinstate the original resource conservation idea of circular economy in relation to heterogeneous industrial residue valorisation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press, 2021. p. 104
Series
Linköping Studies in Science and Technology. Dissertations, ISSN 0345-7524 ; 2179
Keywords
Circular economy, Systems analysis, Valorisation, Resource recovery
National Category
Environmental Management
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-179119 (URN)10.3384/9789179291167 (DOI)9789179291150 (ISBN)9789179291167 (ISBN)
Public defence
2021-12-10, C3, C Building, Campus Valla, Linköping, 09:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Funder
Mistra - The Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research
Note

Incorrect ISBN in printed version corrected by sticker.

Available from: 2021-11-16 Created: 2021-09-12 Last updated: 2025-02-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1706 kB)348 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 1706 kBChecksum SHA-512
1020f2325d377c766c5804b76d02fe69b22057a23e80ff517d8578fa9b931e981c78010c8279c2b617d3706221ad7fa11a6f1c4ead7adab0b16cb76483464c8d
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopusFull text on author's homepage

Authority records

Gunaratne, TharakaKrook, JoakimAndersson, HansEklund, Mats

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Gunaratne, TharakaKrook, JoakimAndersson, HansEklund, Mats
By organisation
Environmental Technology and ManagementFaculty of Science & EngineeringBusiness AdministrationFaculty of Arts and Sciences
In the same journal
Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Other Environmental Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 353 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 340 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf