liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Biomarkers of liver fibrosis: prospective comparison of multimodal magnetic resonance, serum algorithms and transient elastography
Linköping University, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Diagnostics and Specialist Medicine. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Region Östergötland, Center for Diagnostics, Medical radiation physics. Linköping University, Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV).ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4630-6550
Linköping University, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Diagnostics and Specialist Medicine. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Region Östergötland, Center for Surgery, Orthopaedics and Cancer Treatment, Mag- tarmmedicinska kliniken.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2928-4188
Linköping University, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Diagnostics and Specialist Medicine. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Linköping University, Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV). Region Östergötland, Center for Diagnostics, Medical radiation physics.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9876-8274
Linköping University, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Diagnostics and Specialist Medicine. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Region Östergötland, Center for Diagnostics, Department of Radiology in Linköping. Linköping University, Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4111-1693
Show others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, ISSN 0036-5521, E-ISSN 1502-7708, Vol. 55, no 7, p. 848-859Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Accurate biomarkers for quantifying liver fibrosis are important for clinical practice and trial end-points. We compared the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including gadoxetate-enhanced MRI and 31P-MR spectroscopy, with fibrosis stage and serum fibrosis algorithms in a clinical setting. Also, in a subset of patients, MR- and transient elastography (MRE and TE) was evaluated when available.

METHODS: Patients were recruited prospectively if they were scheduled to undergo liver biopsy on a clinical indication due to elevated liver enzyme levels without decompensated cirrhosis. Within a month of the clinical work-up, an MR-examination and liver needle biopsy were performed on the same day. Based on late-phase gadoxetate-enhanced MRI, a mathematical model calculated hepatobiliary function (relating to OATP1 and MRP2). The hepatocyte gadoxetate uptake rate (KHep) and the normalised liver-to-spleen contrast ratio (LSC_N10) were also calculated. Nine serum fibrosis algorithms were investigated (GUCI, King's Score, APRI, FIB-4, Lok-Index, NIKEI, NASH-CRN regression score, Forns' score, and NAFLD-fibrosis score).

RESULTS: The diagnostic performance (AUROC) for identification of significant fibrosis (F2-4) was 0.78, 0.80, 0.69, and 0.78 for MRE, TE, LSC_N10, and GUCI, respectively. For the identification of advanced fibrosis (F3-4), the AUROCs were 0.93, 0.84, 0.81, and 0.82 respectively.

CONCLUSION: MRE and TE were superior for non-invasive identification of significant fibrosis. Serum fibrosis algorithms developed for specific liver diseases are applicable in this cohort of diverse liver diseases aetiologies. Gadoxetate-MRI was sufficiently sensitive to detect the low function losses associated with fibrosis. None was able to efficiently distinguish between stages within the low fibrosis stages.Lay summaryExcessive accumulation of scar tissue, fibrosis, in the liver is an important aspect in chronic liver disease. To replace the invasive needle biopsy, we have explored non-invasive methods to assess liver fibrosis. In our study we found that elastographic methods, which assess the mechanical properties of the liver, are superior in assessing fibrosis in a clinical setting. Of interest from a clinical trial point-of-view, none of the tested methods was sufficiently accurate to distinguish between adjacent moderate fibrosis stages.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2020. Vol. 55, no 7, p. 848-859
Keywords [en]
31P-MR spectroscopy, Elastography, Gadoxetate-enhanced MRI, MRE, liver fibrosis, serum fibrosis algorithms
National Category
Gastroenterology and Hepatology Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-168081DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2020.1786599ISI: 000550074400001PubMedID: 32684060Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85088255610OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-168081DiVA, id: diva2:1458189
Note

Funding agencies: Swedish Research Council (VR/MH, #2007- 2884 as well as VR/NT #2014-6157 both to P. L.), the Medical Research council of Southeast Sweden (FORSS #12621 to P. L.), Vinnova (#2013- 01314 to P. L.), the Linköping University, the Linköping University Hospital Research Foundations, and Region Ostergötland.

Available from: 2020-08-14 Created: 2020-08-14 Last updated: 2026-05-27
In thesis
1. The Non-Invasive Liver Biopsy: Determining Hepatic Function in Diffuse and Focal LiverDisease
Open this publication in new window or tab >>The Non-Invasive Liver Biopsy: Determining Hepatic Function in Diffuse and Focal LiverDisease
2017 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The liver is one of the largest organs within the human body and it handles many vital tasks such as nutrient processing, toxin removal, and synthesis of important proteins. The number of people suffering from chronic liver disease is on the rise, likely due to the present ‘western’ lifestyle. As disease develops in the liver there are pathophysiological manifestations within the liver parenchyma that are both common and important to monitor. These manifestations include inflammation, fatty infiltration (steatosis), excessive scar tissue formation (fibrosis and cirrhosis), and iron loading. Importantly, as the disease progresses there is concurrent loss of liver function. Furthermore, postoperative liver function insufficiency is an important concern when planning surgical treatment of the liver, because it is associated with both morbidity and mortality. Liver function can also be hampered due to drug-induced injuries, an important aspect to consider in drug-development.

Currently, an invasive liver needle biopsy is required to determine the aetiology and to stage or grade the pathophysiological manifestations. There are important limitations with the biopsy, which include, risk of serious complications, mortality, morbidity, inter- and intra-observer variability, sampling error, and sampling variability. Cleary, it would be beneficial to be able investigate the pathophysiological manifestations accurately, non-invasively, and on regional level.

Current available laboratory liver function blood panels are typically insufficient and often only indicate damage at a late stage. Thus, it would be beneficial to have access to biomarkers that are both sensitive and responds to early changes in liver function in both clinical settings and for the pharmaceutical industry and regulatory agencies.

The main aim of this thesis was to develop and evaluate methods that can be used for a ‘non-invasive liver biopsy’ using magnetic resonance (MR). We also aimed to develop sensitive methods for measure liver function based on gadoxetate-enhanced MR imaging (MRI).

The presented work is primarily based on a prospective study on c. 100 patients suffering from chronic liver disease of varying aetiologies recruited due to elevated liver enzyme levels, without clear signs of decompensated cirrhosis. Our results show that the commonly used liver fat cut-off for diagnosing steatosis should be lowered from 5% to 3% when using MR proton-density fat fraction (PDFF). We also show that MR elastography (MRE) is superior in staging fibrosis.

Finally we presented a framework for quantifying liver function based on gadoxetate-enhanced MRI. The method is based on clinical images and a clinical approved contrast agent (gadoxetate). The framework consists of; state-of the-art image reconstruction and correction methods, a mathematical model, and a precise model parametrization method. The model was developed and validated on healthy subjects. Thereafter the model was found applicable on the chronic liver disease cohort as well as validated using gadoxetate levels in biopsy samples and blood samples. The liver function parameters correlated with clinical markers for liver function and liver fibrosis (used as a surrogate marker for liver function).

In summary, it should be possible to perform a non-invasive liver biopsy using: MRI-PDFF for liver fat and iron loading, MRE for liver fibrosis and possibly also inflammation, and measure liver function using the presented framework for analysing gadoxetate-enhanced MRI. With the exception of an MREtransducer no additional hardware is required on the MR scanner. The liver function method is likely to be useful both in a clinical setting and in pharmaceutical trials.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press, 2017. p. 126
Series
Linköping University Medical Dissertations, ISSN 0345-0082 ; 1564
National Category
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging Gastroenterology and Hepatology Biomedical Laboratory Science/Technology Neurology Medical Laboratory Technologies
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-136545 (URN)10.3384/diss.diva-136545 (DOI)9789176855720 (ISBN)
Public defence
2017-05-23, Eken, Campus US, Linköping, 13:15 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Note

The original title of Manuscript IV was Quantitative Assessment of Liver Functions by Gadoxetate-Enhanced MRI: a Prospective Study of Chronic Liver Disease.

Available from: 2017-04-19 Created: 2017-04-19 Last updated: 2025-02-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(4142 kB)777 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 4142 kBChecksum SHA-512
a851a56da3ca2a68e3fd9103c162c23883d95ad48d17b1a023f311efa4f454889a604f4b5d75ee6888922463bba499021471f5fd60c30f9248de4f050c7da5b1
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Forsgren, Mikael FNasr, PatrikKarlsson, MarkusDahlström, NilsNorén, BengtIgnatova, SimoneCedersund, GunnarDahlqvist Leinhard, OlofEkstedt, MattiasKechagias, StergiosLundberg, Peter

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Forsgren, Mikael FNasr, PatrikKarlsson, MarkusDahlström, NilsNorén, BengtIgnatova, SimoneSinkus, RalphCedersund, GunnarDahlqvist Leinhard, OlofEkstedt, MattiasKechagias, StergiosLundberg, Peter
By organisation
Division of Diagnostics and Specialist MedicineFaculty of Medicine and Health SciencesMedical radiation physicsCenter for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV)Mag- tarmmedicinska klinikenDepartment of Radiology in LinköpingDivision of NeurobiologyClinical pathologyDivision of Biomedical EngineeringFaculty of Science & EngineeringDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
In the same journal
Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology
Gastroenterology and HepatologyRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 785 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 937 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf