liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Can we go circular?: On the multifaceted challenges of facilitating shredder fines valorisation in the Swedish context
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Environmental Technology and Management. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4810-2319
2020 (English)Licentiate thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

In concomitance with the growing developments around the circular economy concept in the region, the resource recovery and recycling of industrial production residues is increasingly being envisaged in the European Union and its member states. The role of the recycling industry has become ever important in this context. The shredding industry is based on shredding discarded products such as end-of-life vehicles, and municipal white goods, and subsequent retrieval of (primarily) metals. Shredder fines (or fines) is a heterogeneous fine-granular production residue of this industry, which is currently disposed of. Shredder fines presents, and will continue to do so in the foreseeable future, several challenges that need to be addressed. It creates a disposal problem given the shrinking landfill availability and incurs handling costs to the shredding industry. Furthermore, it reduces our resources efficiency in general.

This thesis aims to contribute knowledge on the challenges of facilitating the valorisation of shredder fines in the context of Sweden. In doing so, the current situation concerning fines and its management was investigated by addressing the research questions; 1) What is the resource potential of fines generated at the studied shredding plant, and 2) Why is the current disposal-oriented management of shredder fines sustained in Sweden. There, a systems perspective was employed, where the research questions were addressed on the material, actor, and institution levels, based on three scientific articles, which are appended.

The studied material carries a certain amount of potentially recoverable resources, nevertheless shows a significant need for upgrading pertaining to the user requirements and regulatory standards of different recovery applications. The full recovery of fines requires integrated processes that could simultaneously harness these resource opportunities and resolve the material constraints. When it comes to the current practice of managing fines in Sweden, the utilisation in landfill covering offers the shredding companies a secure outlet for the material, given it is a well-established practice that has evolved over decades of operations and there is still a significant demand for landfill cover materials. Additionally, it provides shredding companies with a legislatively-compliant low-cost disposal option for managing fines. On the other hand, the complex materiality, lack of marketability of secondary raw materials (SRMs), and unfavourable governmental regulation of waste recovery create strategic disincentives for shredding companies in opting for fines valorisation.

Fines valorisation calls for change in the well-established current practice of utilising the material in landfill covering. Thus, drastic policy measures such as phasing out landfilling and mandating resource recovery and recycling of fines are required to remove the incentives for fines disposal and compel the shredding industry to seek valorisation alternatives for its management. In order to ensure long-term sustenance, applications based on fines valorisation need favourable and more predictable circumstances and settings on different societal levels. There, secure outlets for potential fines-derived SRMs is one of the essential elements. Governmental interventions to create demand and alleviate valorisation investments via market and financial instruments play a significant role in that regard. The other primary requirement to facilitate fines valorisation in the long term is to set clear market and regulatory playing rules. Established supply and demand structures would enable clear pricing mechanisms for fines-derived SRMs and accurate economic assessments of fines valorisation, thus reducing the investment risk for shredding companies. On the other hand, clear regulatory standards and favourable regulatory practices would reduce the uncertainty of the realisation of valorisation applications and gain trust among actors.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press, 2020. , p. 55
Series
Linköping Studies in Science and Technology. Licentiate Thesis, ISSN 0280-7971 ; 1864
National Category
Environmental Management
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-170221DOI: 10.3384/lic.diva-170221ISBN: 9789179299323 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-170221DiVA, id: diva2:1472602
Presentation
2020-10-21, Online through Zoom (contact maria.eriksson@liu.se) and ACAS, A Building, Campus Valla, Linköping, 10:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Funder
Mistra - The Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental ResearchAvailable from: 2020-10-02 Created: 2020-10-02 Last updated: 2025-02-10Bibliographically approved
List of papers
1. Guiding future research on the valorisation of shredder fine residues: A review of four decades of research
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Guiding future research on the valorisation of shredder fine residues: A review of four decades of research
2020 (English)In: Detritus, ISSN 2611-4135, Vol. 09, p. 150-164Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Millions of tonnes of shredder fines are generated and disposed of globally, despite compelling reasons for its recovery. The absence of a review of previous literature, however, makes it difficult to understand the underlying reasons for this. Thus, this study attempts to investigate and assess what, to what extent, and in what ways shredder fines have been addressed in previous research. In doing so, guidelines are drawn for future research to facilitate the valorisation (upgrading and recovery) of shredder fines. Previous research concerning shredder fines was identified with respect to three main research topics. The material characterisation studies are predominantly confined to the occurrence of metals due to their recovery and contamination potential. The process development studies have often undertaken narrowly conceived objectives of addressing one resource opportunity or contamination problem at a time. Consequently, the full recovery (the retrieval of valuable resources and the bulk-utilisation as substitute material) potential of shredder fines has been largely overlooked. The main limitation of policy and regulation studies is the absence of in-depth knowledge on the implications of governmental waste- and resource-policies (macro-level) on actors’ incentives and capacities (micro-level) for fines valorisation, which is necessary to understand the marketability of fines-derived resources. Undertaking a systems perspective is the key to recognising not only the different aspects within the individual research topics but also the inter-relations between them. It also facilitates the internalisation of the inter-relations into topical research.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Padova, Italy: CISA Publisher, 2020
Keywords
Shredder fines, Shredder residue, Valorisation, Recovery, Systems perspective
National Category
Environmental Management
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-167032 (URN)10.31025/2611-4135/2019.13868 (DOI)000521799700019 ()
Projects
Mistra closing the loop II
Funder
Mistra - The Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research
Available from: 2020-06-25 Created: 2020-06-25 Last updated: 2025-02-10Bibliographically approved
2. Potential valorisation of shredder fines: Towards integrated processes formaterial upgrading and resource recovery
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Potential valorisation of shredder fines: Towards integrated processes formaterial upgrading and resource recovery
2020 (English)In: Resources, Conservation and Recycling, ISSN 0921-3449, E-ISSN 1879-0658, Vol. 154, article id 104590Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The lack of process development based on a comprehensive understanding of the material characteristics and the marketability of recoverables is the primary reason why the valorisation of shredder fines has not been realised in practice. In response, a systematic approach was undertaken consisting of 1) strategic sampling and material characterisation, 2) establishing gate and regulatory requirements of potential valorisation applications, and 3) initial feasibility assessment of the selected applications, to guide future research.

The material was sampled over ten weeks in order to obtain both average values and variations of the physical and chemical composition. Thus weekly, primary fractions and sieved fractions ZA (7.10–5.00 mm), ZB (5.00–3.35 mm), ZC (3.35–2.00 mm), ZD (2.00–0.25 mm), and ZE (0.25–0.063 mm) were prepared, and analysed, and benchmarked against the requirements pertaining to five potential applications. The mercury and aluminium concentrations are the biggest challenge in copper smelting and only ZA and ZB show significant potential. Energy recovery is limited to ZA, ZB, and ZC, provided the chlorine and metals concentrations are decreased. Regarding the recovery as bulk-material in construction, the reduction of the metal content would likely be a pre-requisite.

The utilisation of fines in the individual applications would either leave a significant amount of fines un-valorised or overlook the recovery of valuable resources. The upgrading of the material to suit the different applications would also require addressing multiple material constraints simultaneously. Therefore, realising the full resource potential of shredder fines would require the integration of different upgrading and recovery processes.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2020
Keywords
Shredder fines, Valorisation, Upgrading, Recovery, Characterisation, User requirements
National Category
Other Environmental Engineering
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-167036 (URN)10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104590 (DOI)000540553600036 ()2-s2.0-85075936986 (Scopus ID)
Projects
Mistra Closing the loop II
Funder
Mistra - The Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research
Note

Funding agencies: Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research (Mistra)Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research

Available from: 2020-06-25 Created: 2020-06-25 Last updated: 2021-09-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(4253 kB)479 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 4253 kBChecksum SHA-512
ace595c77d27dd30c2d72df6a71a4dc970aa00b9ba48c819376e8914e63c0bbfc5d543d1374535c56f01d2d943dde13d0ea1e69ce7b09571d2ccbc71f3ed8827
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf
Order online >>

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Gunaratne, Tharaka

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Gunaratne, Tharaka
By organisation
Environmental Technology and ManagementFaculty of Science & Engineering
Environmental Management

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 482 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 937 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf