liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Development and validation of REAGERA-P, a new questionnaire to evaluate health care provider preparedness to identify and manage elder abuse
Linköping University, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Region Östergötland, Local Health Care Services in Central Östergötland, Department of Acute Internal Medicine and Geriatrics.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0704-202X
Linköping University, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Society and Health. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Region Östergötland, Regionledningskontoret, Enheten för folkhälsa.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6281-7783
Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Region Östergötland, Local Health Care Services in Central Östergötland, Department of Acute Internal Medicine and Geriatrics. Linköping University, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Center for Social and Affective Neuroscience. Region Östergötland, Psykiatricentrum, Psykiatriska kliniken i Linköping. Linköping University, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences.
2021 (English)In: BMC Health Services Research, E-ISSN 1472-6963, Vol. 21, no 1, article id 473Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Elder abuse is prevalent and associated with morbidity but often goes unnoticed in health care. Research on the health care response to victims calls for valid measurements. This article describes the development and validation of a questionnaire to evaluate health care provider preparedness to care for older adults subjected to abuse, the REAGERA-P (Responding to Elder Abuse in GERiAtric Care - Provider questionnaire).

METHOD: REAGERA-P was developed in phase I. The questionnaire includes a case vignette, self-efficacy scales for identifying and managing elder abuse cases and cause for concern as well as organizational barriers when talking with older patients about abuse. Content validity was ensured by a review committee, and cognitive interviews were conducted to ensure face validity and to examine cognitive processes to ensure comprehension. REAGERA-P was then administered to health care providers (n = 154, response rate 99 %) to test for construct validity. Factor analysis was performed, and internal consistency was tested for the self-efficacy scales. Convergent validity was tested by investigating associations between relevant variables. Some items were revised in phase II, and new cognitive interviews were performed. Parts of the questionnaire were tested for responsiveness by administering it to medical interns (n = 31, response rate 80 %) before and after an educational intervention.

RESULTS: REAGERA-P showed good content and face validity. The factor analysis revealed two factors: one for asking questions about abuse (Cronbach's α = 0.75) and one for managing the response to the questions (Cronbach's α = 0.87). Results suggest good convergent validity for the self-efficacy scales and for questions about cause for concern and organizational barriers. The responsiveness of the self-efficacy scales was good: the mean on the scale for asking questions (range 0-30) was 15.0 before the intervention and 21.5 afterwards, the mean on the scale for managing the response (range 0-50) was 22.4 before the intervention and 32.5 afterwards.

CONCLUSION: REAGERA-P is a new questionnaire that can be used to evaluate health care provider preparedness to identify and manage cases of elder abuse, including educational interventions conducted among staff to improve health care responses to victims of elder abuse. This initial testing of the questionnaire indicates that the REAGERA-P has good validity.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BMC , 2021. Vol. 21, no 1, article id 473
Keywords [en]
instrument development, intimate partner violence, mistreatment, neglect, older adults, validity
National Category
Geriatrics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-175789DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06469-2ISI: 000651807500001PubMedID: 34006271OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-175789DiVA, id: diva2:1556743
Funder
The Swedish Crime Victim Compensation and Support Authority, 3322/2017, 2944/2018, 3384/2019
Note

Funding: Swedish Crime Victim Compensation and Support Authority [3322/2017, 2944/2018, 03384/2019]; Region Ostergotland [RO-908641]; Linkoping University

Available from: 2021-05-24 Created: 2021-05-24 Last updated: 2022-09-15

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(845 kB)290 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 845 kBChecksum SHA-512
0b118c2d00ba211acbff709c2f738982a6b20e09f8d333eb6da72c4d1776b3b0c5350f20d6369bbb27ce7abe505a1a95285f99dd27f7cc46720f5d0ee43e90d7
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Simmons, JohannaWenemark, MarikaLudvigsson, Mikael

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Simmons, JohannaWenemark, MarikaLudvigsson, Mikael
By organisation
Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community MedicineFaculty of Medicine and Health SciencesDepartment of Acute Internal Medicine and GeriatricsDivision of Society and HealthEnheten för folkhälsaCenter for Social and Affective NeurosciencePsykiatriska kliniken i LinköpingDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences
In the same journal
BMC Health Services Research
Geriatrics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 290 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 329 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf