liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Fatigue Response Dependence of Thickness Measurement Methods for Additively Manufactured E-PBF Ti-6Al-4 V
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Engineering Materials. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7606-5244
(Manufacturing Technology Centre, Coventry, UK)
(Manufacturing Technology Centre, Coventry, UK)
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Engineering Materials. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering. (Saab AB, Aeronautics, Linköping)
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, ISSN 8756-758X, E-ISSN 1460-2695, Vol. 44, no 7, p. 1931-1943, article id 13461Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Light weight metal parts produced with additive manufacturing have gained increasing interest from the aerospace industry in recent years. However, light weight parts often require thin walls which can have different material properties compared to thick bulk material. In this work, the fatigue properties of Ti-6Al-4 V produced by electron beam powder bed fusion have been investigated for samples with three different wall thicknesses ranging from 1.3 to 2.7 mm and in three different directions; 0°, 45°, and 90° relative to the build plate. Generally, the 90° specimens show worse fatigue life compared to both 0° and 45°. It was found that the fatigue strength is lower for thin samples compared to thicker samples when the stress is calculated from nominal thickness or calliper measurements. However, since materials produced by electron beam powder bed fusion often have a rough as-built surface, the load bearing area is not easy to determine. In this paper, four different methods for determining the load bearing area are presented. It is shown that if the surface roughness is considered when calculating the stress levels, the influence from specimen thickness decreases or even disappears. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2021. Vol. 44, no 7, p. 1931-1943, article id 13461
Keywords [en]
Additive materials, fatigue, surface roughness, Ti-6Al-4 V
National Category
Materials Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-176026DOI: 10.1111/ffe.13461ISI: 000647194300001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85105647685OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-176026DiVA, id: diva2:1559077
Available from: 2021-06-01 Created: 2021-06-01 Last updated: 2023-12-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(60878 kB)197 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 60878 kBChecksum SHA-512
ce24d646831962df6e55f250e86e2e3bcfa74c0728e09efb300e00306064cecdcb82491c45aeec2a4c06b6e6a8604450c562724525149a835f869dd31e83b7f2
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Segersäll, MikaelKahlin, MagnusMoverare, Johan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Segersäll, MikaelKahlin, MagnusMoverare, Johan
By organisation
Engineering MaterialsFaculty of Science & Engineering
In the same journal
Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures
Materials Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 197 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 210 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf