liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Radiology departmental policy compliance with Swedish guidelines regarding post-contrast acute kidney injury for examinations with iodinated contrast media
Department of Natural Science and Biomedicine, School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden.
Department of Natural Science and Biomedicine, School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden.
Department of Radiology, Höglandssjukhuset, Eksjö, Sweden.
Region Östergötland, Center for Diagnostics, Department of Radiology in Motala.
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: Radiography, ISSN 1078-8174, E-ISSN 1532-2831, Vol. 27, no 4, p. 1058-1063Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Introduction: Guidelines concerning intravenous iodinated contrast media (CM) during computed tomography (CT) examinations are important to follow to minimize the risk for post-contrast acute kidney injury (PC-AKI). The purpose of this study was to investigate the radiology departmental policy compliance with Swedish guidelines concerning PC-AKI. Methods: In February 2020, an electronic survey was distributed to the responsible radiographer at 41 radiology departments in all university hospitals and medium-sized hospitals in Sweden. The questions focused on routines around renal functional tests, individualized contrast administration and handling of patients with diabetes mellitus taking metformin. Results: The response rate was 83%. Seventy-six percent (n = 26) of radiology departments calculated estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from serum creatinine prior to CM administration, but only 24% (n = 8) followed the recommendation to calculate eGFR from both serum creatinine and cystatin C. For acute/inpatients, 55% (n = 18) followed the recommendation that renal functional tests should be performed within 12 h before CM administration. For elective patients, 97% (n = 33) followed the recommendation to have eGFR newer than three months which is acceptable for patients with no history of disease that may have affected renal function. Approximately 80% of the radiology departments followed the recommendation that CM dose always should be individually adjusted to patient eGFR. Seventy-six percent (n = 26) followed the recommendation to continue with metformin at eGFR > 45 ml/min. Conclusion: Compliance with the national guidelines was high regarding routines around renal functional tests, dose adjustment of CM and metformin discontinuation. Improvements can be made in using both cystatin C and serum creatinine for eGFR calculations as well as ensuring renal function tests within 12 h for acute/inpatients with acute disease that may affect renal function. Implications for practice: This study raises awareness of the importance of adhering to guidelines in healthcare. To have knowledge about the current level of compliance regarding PCI-AKI is important to maintain and develop effective clinical implementation of guidelines. The variation in practice seen in this study emphasizes the need of more effective implementation strategies to ensure adherence with best practice. (C) 2021 The College of Radiographers. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2021. Vol. 27, no 4, p. 1058-1063
Keywords [en]
Metformin; Patient safety; Acute kidney injury; Prevention; Glomerular filtration rate; Renal function tests
National Category
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-178228DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2021.04.009ISI: 000706205800014PubMedID: 34023227Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85106374234OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-178228DiVA, id: diva2:1585037
Available from: 2021-08-16 Created: 2021-08-16 Last updated: 2022-05-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(3498 kB)164 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 3498 kBChecksum SHA-512
a843f529afcefa748710743f2a05133682b1931939858dfccf2b9e086d8c08946eb7fd522a7afd372b7c2d160c84780ca8fd83e855f3a4cb20efd5527b58866b
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Kihlberg, Johan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Krakys, E.Kihlberg, Johan
By organisation
Department of Radiology in MotalaDivision of Diagnostics and Specialist MedicineFaculty of Medicine and Health SciencesCenter for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV)Department of Radiology in Linköping
In the same journal
Radiography
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 164 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 153 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf