liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
System disruptions
There are recurring service disruptions on some of the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparison of multiphase data from CT perfusion vs clinical 4-phase CT scans with respect to image quality, lesion detection, and LI-RADS classification in HCC patients
Linköping University, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Region Östergötland, Center for Diagnostics, Department of Radiology in Linköping.
Linköping University, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Region Östergötland, Center for Diagnostics, Department of Radiology in Linköping. Linköping University, Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV).
Linköping University, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Diagnostics and Specialist Medicine. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Region Östergötland, Center for Diagnostics, Department of Radiology in Linköping. Linköping University, Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV).
2022 (English)In: Heliyon, E-ISSN 2405-8440, Vol. 8, no 1, article id e08757Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the image quality and diagnostic performance of reconstructed arterial (A) and portal venous (PV) phases in computed tomography perfusion (CTP) scans compared to the corresponding phases in standard 4-phase CT and to assess the utility for LI-RADS classification using CTP and 4-phase 4CT. Methods: A total of 26 scans with each method (CTP and 4-phase CT) from 19 hepatocellular carcinoma patients were analyzed and compared. Arterial and PV phases reconstructed by advanced modeled iterative reconstruction at strength 4 (ADMIRE 4) from raw CTP data were compared with image sets from arterial and PV phases of 4-phase CT (ADMIRE 3) in the same patient with respect to image quality. Results: Quantitative image analysis showed that reconstructed CTP datasets were equivalent to 4-phase CT image sets. Qualitative image analysis revealed similar lesion detection rates with the 2 methods for patients with an abdominal diameter <= 36 cm and body weight <90 kg, but lower detection rates with CTP for patients with an abdominal diameter >37 cm. There was no difference in Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) classifications between the 2 methods. Conclusion: Reconstructed CTP images can potentially replace 4-phase CT images in patients weighing <90 kg and with a body diameter <37 cm, as the 2 methods are comparable in terms of quantitative image quality and ability to detect and classify lesions based on LI-RADS criteria.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier Science Ltd , 2022. Vol. 8, no 1, article id e08757
Keywords [en]
Perfusion imaging; HCC; 4-Dimensional computed tomography; Image quality; CT
National Category
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-184110DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08757ISI: 000767184700107PubMedID: 35146150OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-184110DiVA, id: diva2:1651136
Note

Funding Agencies|County Council of Östergötland, Sweden (LFoU)

Available from: 2022-04-11 Created: 2022-04-11 Last updated: 2024-02-07

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1118 kB)224 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1118 kBChecksum SHA-512
3e3e0cd09a72400136e46732c3e14ce4c4bb4a9d5dfc2bcc5485eddd4ad275ec10d9cbcdb4eb6bf141d54f8912904e156d15ab4b1b87c34343ca987e5da23aa7
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Bartholomä, Wolf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Mohammadi, A.Bartholomä, WolfWoisetschläger, Mischa
By organisation
Department of Health, Medicine and Caring SciencesFaculty of Medicine and Health SciencesDepartment of Radiology in LinköpingCenter for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV)Division of Diagnostics and Specialist Medicine
In the same journal
Heliyon
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 226 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 156 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf