liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Optimal Selection of Model Validation Experiments: Guided by Coverage
Systems Simulation and Concept Design, Saab Aeronautics, Linköping, Östergötland, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5773-3518
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Fluid and Mechatronic Systems. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7480-1922
Innovation and Technology Management, Saab Aeronautics, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3120-1361
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Fluid and Mechatronic Systems. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2315-0680
2021 (English)In: Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification, ISSN 2377-2158, Vol. 6, no 3, article id 031006Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Modeling and Simulation (M&S) is seen as a means to mitigate the difficulties associated with increased system complexity, integration, and cross-couplings effects encountered during development of aircraft subsystems. As a consequence, knowledge of model validity is necessary for taking robust and justified design decisions. This paper presents a method for using coverage metrics to formulate an optimal model validation strategy. Three fundamentally different and industrially relevant use-cases are presented. The first use-case entails the successive identification of validation settings, and the second considers the simultaneous identification of n validation settings. The latter of these two use-cases is finally expanded to incorporate a secondary model-based objective to the optimization problem in a third use-case. The approach presented is designed to be scalable and generic to models of industrially relevant complexity. As a result, selecting experiments for validation is done objectively with little required manual effort.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
ASME International , 2021. Vol. 6, no 3, article id 031006
Keywords [en]
Aircraft, Design, Model validation, Modeling, Optimization, Simulation, Fuels, Fuel consumption
National Category
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-191125DOI: 10.1115/1.4051497ISI: 000904102300006Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85124479733OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-191125DiVA, id: diva2:1728795
Note

Funding agencies: Vinnova and Saab Aeronautics. 

Available from: 2023-01-19 Created: 2023-01-19 Last updated: 2025-10-30Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. On the Realization of Credible Simulations in Aircraft Development: Efficient and Independent Validation Enabled by Automation
Open this publication in new window or tab >>On the Realization of Credible Simulations in Aircraft Development: Efficient and Independent Validation Enabled by Automation
2023 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Designing modern aircraft is not an easy task. Today, it is not enough to optimize aircraft subsystems at a subsystem level. Instead, a holistic approach is necessary whereby the constituent subsystems need to be designed for the best joint performance. The State-of-the-Art (SotA) in simulating and ex-changing simulation models is moving forward at a fast pace. As such, the feasible use of simulation models has increased and additional benefits can be exploited, such as analyzing coupled subsystems in simulators. Furthermore, if aircraft subsystem simulation models are to be utilized to their fullest extent, open-source tooling and the use of open standards, interoperability between domain specific modeling tools, alongside efficient and automated processes for model Verification and Validation (V&V) and credibility assessment are required.

The financial and safety related risks associated with aircraft development and operation require well founded design and operational decisions. If those decisions are to be founded upon information provided by models and simulators, then the credibility of that information needs to be assessed and communicated. Today, the large number of sensors available in modern aircraft enable model validation and credibility assessment on a different scale than what has been possible up to this point. This thesis aims to identify and address challenges to allow for automated, independent, and objective methods of integrating subsystem models into simulators while assessing and conveying the constituent models aggregated credibility.

The results of the work include a proposed method for presenting the individual models’ aggregated credibility in a simulator. As the communicated credibility of simulators here relies on the credibility of each included model, the assembly procedure itself cannot introduce unknown discrepancies with respect to the System of Interest (SoI). Available methods for the management, distribution, and accurate simulation of coupled models are therefore exploited and tailored to the applications of aircraft development under consideration. Finally, a framework for automated model validation is outlined and established that supports both on-line and on-line simulator credibility assessment.   

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press, 2023. p. 341
Series
Linköping Studies in Science and Technology. Dissertations, ISSN 0345-7524 ; 2279
Keywords
Aircraft Vehicle Systems, Credibility Assessment, FMI, Interoperability, Modelica, Modeling and Simulation, Model integration, SSP
National Category
Embedded Systems
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-191132 (URN)10.3384/9789179295981 (DOI)9789179295974 (ISBN)9789179295981 (ISBN)
Public defence
2023-03-03, ACAS, A-building, Campus Valla, Linköping, 10:15 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Note

Funding agencies: INNOVA and Saab Aeronautics

Available from: 2023-01-19 Created: 2023-01-19 Last updated: 2023-01-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopushttps://doi.org/10.1115/1.4051497

Authority records

Hällqvist, RobertBraun, RobertEek, MagnusKrus, Petter

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hällqvist, RobertBraun, RobertEek, MagnusKrus, Petter
By organisation
Fluid and Mechatronic SystemsFaculty of Science & Engineering
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 250 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf