liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Visual diplomacy in virtual summitry: Status signalling during the coronavirus crisis
Department of Government, Uppsala University, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0480-8715
Department of Political Science, Lund University, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9492-2628
2022 (English)In: Review of International Studies, ISSN 0260-2105, E-ISSN 1469-9044, Vol. 48, no 2, p. 243-261Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

On 26 March 2020, the leaders of the Group of twenty major economies (G20) convened in an emergency virtual meeting to discuss the extraordinary situation facing the world. Virtual summitry provided a stark visual contrast to the traditional staging of modern multilateral diplomacy – leaders were suddenly responsible for their own staging, leaving them with new opportunities to create a favourable impression of how they, and their respective state, would be seen. Taking the disruption of virtual summitry as a starting point, we focus on the resulting new opportunities for visual diplomacy. We draw on the symbolic interactionism of Erving Goffman and we argue that status signalling in this context was based on a shared understanding of the symbols and resources that have social value in the interaction order of summit diplomacy. Based on a visual analysis of 51 photographs from the G20 video conference, we find that the visual performances during the extraordinary meeting reflected evident, but not necessarily intentional, attempts at status seeking. The article thus contributes to an increased understanding of how visual performances contribute to uphold status distinctions in multilateral diplomacy.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Cambridge University Press, 2022. Vol. 48, no 2, p. 243-261
National Category
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalisation Studies)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-209043DOI: 10.1017/s0260210521000607ISI: 000765581500004OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-209043DiVA, id: diva2:1910130
Funder
Marianne and Marcus Wallenberg Foundation, 2018.0090Available from: 2024-11-04 Created: 2024-11-04 Last updated: 2024-11-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(652 kB)123 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 652 kBChecksum SHA-512
98e95e0569be7c38e662da5c838d77c9632a5e359b93340ce2a632d49da18aa6677ab9910bbf59bbbbe7d7047d5fdbe435cad812f2796f658a0d3e76814c792a
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Danielson, August

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Danielson, AugustHedling, Elsa
In the same journal
Review of International Studies
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalisation Studies)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 124 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 360 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf