liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
1314151617181916 of 112
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Appendicitis during Pregnancy: Incidence, management and pregnancy outcomes
Linköping University, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Division of Surgery, Orthopedics and Oncology. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences.
2025 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Background: Appendicitis during pregnancy is rare but still the most common reason for non-obstetric surgery during pregnancy. Evidence on incidence patterns across gestation, pregnancy outcomes, and management is limited and often methodologically heterogeneous. The overall aims were to investigate the incidence and management of suspected appendicitis during pregnancy, and to assess pregnancy outcomes following appendicitis and/or appendectomy.

Methods: Papers I–II are nationwide, register-based cohort studies using the Swedish Medical Birth Register and National Patient Register (1973–2013/2023).The incidence of appendicitis across pregnancy trimesters and during the intervals one year before and two years after pregnancy was estimated and reported as incidence rates (IR) and standardized incidence ratios (SIR). Outcomes included IUFD, preterm birth, cesarean section, Apgar <7 at 5 minutes, SGA and neonatal mortality. Paper II additionally used matched case–control analyses by gestational age at exposure to estimate odds ratios for outcomes. Paper III is a nested case–control study (2010–2013) of pregnant patients undergoing appendectomy or admitted with nonspecific abdominal pain, evaluating diagnostic imaging and the AIR score (discrimination by AUC; sensitivity/specificity thresholds). Paper IV is a randomized, single-blind national survey of on-call surgeons (spring 2025) using parallel case scenarios (pregnant vs non-pregnant), with primary outcomes of management choices and adherence to AIR-based recommendations; TFA and PRA scales were included evaluating personality traits linked to tolerance for uncertainty and risk attitude among surgeons.

Main Results: Incidence of appendicitis was markedly lower during pregnancy, especially in the third trimester, followed by a peripartum spike and a postpartum elevation that normalized within two years. In 1973–2023 data, appendicitis/appendectomy during pregnancy was associated with moderate increased risks of preterm birth (overall OR ~1.9), cesarean delivery (OR ~1.6), low 5-minute Apgar, and neonatal mortality, but not IUFD or SGA. Risks rose steeply with advancing gestational age at exposure; at 32–36 weeks, preterm birth reached 43.1% (aOR 9.84, 95% CI 8.21–11.80). Early-pregnancy surgery was not associated with excess preterm risk after adjustment, whereas late-pregnancy surgery and conservative management were. Synchronous cesarean and appendectomy increased with gestation. The AIR score performed well in pregnancy (AUC 0.88–0.90); sensitivity for complicated appendicitis was 100% at ≥4 points and specificity for any appendicitis 97% at ≥9. Imaging (mainly US) showed limited performance (sensitivity 45%, specificity 42%). In randomized questionnaires with clinical case scenarios (response rate 41.5%, n=370), pregnancy status shifted surgeons decisions toward observation/imaging in low–intermediate probability scenarios and greater preference for open surgery in high probability. Pregnancy and the reported use of a clinical score were independently associated to adherence to AIR-based recommendations in the intermediate probability case scenario. Clinical experience but not TFA or PRA scores were associated with management preferences.

Conclusions: Pregnancy appears transiently protective against appendicitis, yet appendicitis in late gestation is linked to substantially increased obstetric intervention and preterm birth—at least partly iatrogenic through synchronous delivery. Structured clinical assessment remains valid in pregnancy; the AIR score reliably stratifies risk, whereas routine imaging performance is limited. Management strategies should be tailored to gestational age, judicious use of imaging, and adherence to validated clinical algorithms. These findings support the need for gestation-specific guidelines and pathways to balance maternal surgical safety with fetal outcomes.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press, 2025. , p. 71
Series
Linköping University Medical Dissertations, ISSN 0345-0082 ; 2007
Keywords [en]
Appendicitis, Appendectomy, Pregnancy, Incidence, Pregnancy outcomes
National Category
Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-219278DOI: 10.3384/9789181182880ISBN: 9789181182873 (print)ISBN: 9789181182880 (electronic)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-219278DiVA, id: diva2:2011416
Public defence
2025-12-05, Originalet, Qulturum, Building B4, Ryhov County Hospital, Jönköping, 13:00 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2025-11-04 Created: 2025-11-04 Last updated: 2025-11-06Bibliographically approved
List of papers
1. Major Variation in the Incidence of Appendicitis Before, During and After Pregnancy: A Population-Based Cohort Study
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Major Variation in the Incidence of Appendicitis Before, During and After Pregnancy: A Population-Based Cohort Study
Show others...
2020 (English)In: World Journal of Surgery, ISSN 0364-2313, E-ISSN 1432-2323, Vol. 44, p. 2601-2608Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background Previous studies indicate a low incidence of appendicitis in third-trimester pregnancy, suggesting a protecting effect of pregnancy. This large population-based cohort study analyzes the association of appendicitis with pregnancy in more detail. The aim of the study was to investigate the incidence of appendicitis and negative appendectomy before, during and after pregnancy. Methods Cross-linking between two Swedish health registries provided data on appendectomy for all women in Sweden giving birth between 1973 and 2013. We analyzed the incidence rates (IR) of perforated and non-perforated appendicitis and negative appendectomy before, during and after pregnancy, and secular trends during the study period. Standardized incidence ratios (SIR) were estimated using age-, sex- and period-specific IR from the background population in Sweden. Results Some 3,888,452 pregnancies resulted in birth during the study period. An appendectomy was registered for 27,575 women in the interval starting one year before and ending two years after pregnancy. The incidence of appendicitis varied substantially during and after pregnancy. SIR for perforated appendicitis was 0.47 (95% CI 0.38-0.59) in the third trimester, 3.89 (2.92-5.18) peripartum, 2.20 (1.89-2.55) in the puerperium and 1.27 (1.19-1.36) in the year postpartum. The pattern was similar for non-perforated appendicitis. Negative appendectomy decreased postpartum. Incidence rate of non-perforated appendicitis and negative appendectomy decreased for both pregnant and non-pregnant women during the study period. Conclusions The findings in this study suggest a protecting effect of pregnancy on the development of appendicitis, which is followed by a rebound effect after birth.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
SPRINGER, 2020
National Category
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-165678 (URN)10.1007/s00268-020-05524-z (DOI)000528296100001 ()32328784 (PubMedID)
Note

Funding Agencies|Futurum -Academy of Healthcare at Region Jonkoping County

Available from: 2020-05-25 Created: 2020-05-25 Last updated: 2025-11-04
2. Validation of the Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR) score during pregnancy: A nested case-control study
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Validation of the Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR) score during pregnancy: A nested case-control study
2024 (English)In: Academic Emergency Medicine, ISSN 1069-6563, E-ISSN 1553-2712, Vol. 31, no 9, p. 894-902Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

ObjectivesAppendicitis poses diagnostic challenges. A correct diagnosis is important during pregnancy to avoid unnecessary surgery on the one hand and delayed surgery on the other hand, as both may negatively affect pregnancy outcomes. Clinical scores for risk-stratified management of suspected appendicitis are well established in adults but have not been validated during pregnancy. This nested case-control study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR) score and imaging during pregnancy.MethodsBy cross-linking national Swedish health registries from a defined geographical area, we identified a cohort of 154 women who underwent appendectomy for suspected appendicitis during pregnancy and a matched cohort of 232 pregnant women admitted for acute abdominal pain and suspected appendicitis but with a discharge diagnosis of nonspecific abdominal pain (NSAP). All variables were extracted from medical records. The diagnostic value of AIR score and imaging was estimated for patients with a final diagnosis of appendicitis compared with patients with negative appendectomy and NSAP patients.ResultsThe final diagnoses for the operated patients were uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis in 49.4% and 26.6%, respectively, and negative appendectomy in 24.0%. Nearly half of all the patients underwent diagnostic imaging (41%), mainly by ultrasonography. The sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic imaging were 44.9% (95% CI 32.9%-57.4%) and 42.2% (95% CI 31.9%-53.1%), respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of AIR score was 0.88 (95% CI 0.84-0.92) for all appendicitis and 0.90 (95% CI 0.84-0.95) for complicated appendicitis. The sensitivity for complicated appendicitis was 100% at a score of &gt;= 4. The specificity for all appendicitis was 97% at a score of &gt;= 9.ConclusionsThe results of this study suggest that the AIR score may be a suitable diagnostic tool for risk stratification of pregnant women with abdominal pain and suspected appendicitis but further validation among pregnant women is needed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
WILEY, 2024
National Category
General Practice
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-202923 (URN)10.1111/acem.14915 (DOI)001199411400001 ()38597185 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-85190448585 (Scopus ID)
Note

Funding Agencies|Futurum - Academy for Healthcare at Jnkping Region County

Available from: 2024-04-22 Created: 2024-04-22 Last updated: 2025-11-04

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(6490 kB)15 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 6490 kBChecksum SHA-512
c5f571f9db056c7148414caa6b8406a7d7fd44e6a84443355a420996cb725d2e77dc218e96de1aaab8c8e70636ab5999f1b16887803b096b95c7680c19172b3d
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf
Order online >>

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Moltubak, Elin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Moltubak, Elin
By organisation
Division of Surgery, Orthopedics and OncologyFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences
Surgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 128 hits
1314151617181916 of 112
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf