liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
"Beautiful, unnatural thing": Subversiva monster och konstruerade kroppar i Poor Things, Bunny och Our Hideous Progeny
Linköping University, Department of Culture and Society.
2026 (Swedish)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (One Year)), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesisAlternative title
"Beautiful, unnatural thing" : Subversive Monsters and Constructed Bodies in Poor Things, Bunny and Our Hideous Progeny (English)
Abstract [en]

In Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley's (1797-1851) seminal novel Frankenstein, or, The Modern Prometheus (1818), the body and the monster are revealed to be closely connected as Frankenstein's creature comes to embody the ultimate Other, equally repellent, frightening, and fascinating in his artificial corporeality. In this study I examine three modern novels – Poor Things (1992) by Alasdair Gray (1934-2019), Bunny (2019) by Mona Awad (b. 1978) and Our Hideous Progeny (2023) by C.E. McGill (b. 2000) – which, I argue, may all be linked to Shelley's novel through their shared usage of the Frankenstein motif: the creation or construction of artificial bodies. Focusing especially on the female protagonists of the novels, this study aims to illustrate how the novels use, subvert, and recontextualize the Frankenstein motif to explore the notion of the monstrous body, particularly the relationship between monstrosity, femininity, and queer existence. Combining feminist and posthumanist theory, I examine the novels' portrayals of female agency, reproduction, and sexuality as well as the seemingly contradictory term monstrous cuteness, showcasing the various ways in which the body may be used as a tool for subversion and reclaiming agency. The findings of this study highlight the figure of the monster as simultaneously ostracized object and powerful subject, revealing the implicit power dichotomies inherent in Cartesian humanism as well as advocating for a broader, more inclusive understanding of the human.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2026. , p. 64
Keywords [en]
Monstrosity, corporeality, Frankenstein, subversion, posthumanism, feminism, Poor Things, Bunny, Our Hideous Progeny
National Category
General Literature Studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-225301OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-225301DiVA, id: diva2:2075614
Subject / course
Comparative Literature
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2026-08-10 Created: 2026-06-18 Last updated: 2026-08-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(705 kB)12 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 705 kBChecksum SHA-512
da603c64ba6e9ecd141eb2deac392829faa4da2717bff833da4e90fa89055ce3d8fc41cd96eada1a03361cd1604f777a84518f37b0ab1a68d7c8f5b229f1a647
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Culture and Society
General Literature Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 2434 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf