liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
System disruptions
There are recurring service disruptions on some of the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
12345672 of 15
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Directional Sensitivity for DoA Estimation: From Missed Detections to Tracks
Linköping University, Department of Electrical Engineering, Automatic Control. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6672-4472
2026 (English)Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Direction of arrival (DOA) estimation is a well-studied problem in signal processing with applications in radar, sonar, acoustics, seismology, and wireless communications. It involves estimating the direction from which a signal arrives at a sensor array, for example to locate a missing person or animal from a wireless tag or the sound they produce. Traditionally, DOA estimation relies on time difference of arrival (TDOA) measurements between spatially separated sensors. However, accurately estimating these time differences can be challenging and often requires sufficiently large sensor arrays.

The main contribution in this thesis is a DOA estimation method based on received signal power rather than TDOA measurements. It exploits the directional sensitivity of microphones and antennas, modeled using a Fourier series (FS) representation that provides a compact, parametric description of sensor responses over the periodic range of DOA angles. This model is used to derive the proposed estimator and analyze its theoretical performance using the Cramér-Rao lower bound (CRLB).

The proposed method is evaluated in the acoustic domain using a range of signals, including a gunshot, an elephant trumpet, a siren, and a female scream. The results show that the directional sensitivity depends strongly on the frequency content of the signal, which can be exploited for accurate DOA estimation. Across the investigated natural signals, the method matches or outperforms established approaches, including multiple signal classification (MUSIC) and minimum variance distortionless response (MVDR), in both anechoic and outdoor environments.

A key advantage is that the method requires no TDOA measurements, enabling smaller and portable sensor devices. Its main limitation is that the directional sensitivity must be determined by calibration in a controlled environment. The calibration is nevertheless shown to be robust across different environmental conditions and over time.

The framework is further extended to measurements subject to detection thresholds. Rather than discarding signals that fall below the threshold, the proposed estimator jointly exploits detections and missed detections through a likelihood function that accounts for both outcomes. The formulation combines the FS sensor model with a known detection threshold and is independent of the sensing modality, making it applicable whenever the sensor response and detection threshold are known. The framework is validated using Bluetooth low energy (BLE) signals from directional antennas, where receiver thresholding provides a natural example of incomplete measurements. The proposed method consistently achieves higher DOA estimation accuracy than a baseline that ignores missed detections, with the advantage increasing at higher missed detection rates.

Finally, the framework is integrated into the Bernoulli filter (BF) formulation for recursive tracking in the presence of missed detections, false alarms, and uncertainty about target existence. Simulations show accurate tracking even at increasing missed detection rates, while a baseline that assumes a constant detection probability degrades. Classical TDOA-based estimation and tracking are additionally illustrated using seismic measurements of elephant footsteps.

Together, these contributions form a general DOA estimation and tracking framework using directionally sensitive sensors, including measurements subject to detection thresholds. The framework is demonstrated using acoustic and wireless sensing and enables small sensor arrays without TDOA measurements while maintaining accurate estimation and tracking even when a large fraction of potential measurements are lost.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press, 2026. , p. 130
Series
Linköping Studies in Science and Technology. Dissertations, ISSN 0345-7524 ; 2547
National Category
Control Engineering Signal Processing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-227683DOI: 10.3384/9789181187069ISBN: 9789181187052 (print)ISBN: 9789181187069 (electronic)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-227683DiVA, id: diva2:2101788
Public defence
2026-10-16, Ada Lovelace, B Building, Campus Valla, Linköping,, 09:30 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2026-09-16 Created: 2026-09-16 Last updated: 2026-09-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(34312 kB)58 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 34312 kBChecksum SHA-512
d0db3b3150e694c2b92dfc4955312995c833f861dab9c11db92f7827f40b4b40b7e5e9bf61b9b573da98bcf589206654e3b52ada186b9e6f2ff59b3dde91927f
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf
Order online >>

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Zetterqvist, Gustav

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Zetterqvist, Gustav
By organisation
Automatic ControlFaculty of Science & Engineering
Control EngineeringSignal Processing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 427 hits
12345672 of 15
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf