liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Patterns of disruption: diagnosing response mechanisms in actor networks
Linköping University, Department of Computer and Information Science, Human-Centered systems. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering. (IxS)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8234-0652
Linköping University, Department of Computer and Information Science, Human-Centered systems. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering. (IxS)
Linköping University, Department of Computer and Information Science, Human-Centered systems. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering. (IxS)
2020 (English)In: ServDes.2020 Tensions / Paradoxes / Plurality 2021 Conference Proceeding / [ed] Yoko Akama, Liam Fennessy, Sara Harrington, Anna Farago, Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press, 2020, Vol. 173, p. 65-65Conference paper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Service and the contexts in which they occur are undergoing rapid. Failures associated with service also happen in increasingly complex, networked contexts. Such network configurations and exchange relationships are crucial mediators of value cocreation. Therefore, it is important to understand patterns of disruptions in service, and how actors influence possible failures through their participation, as it will impact value creation. This paper reports the results of an interview study conducted using a modified critical incident technique supported by design-driven generative tools. We identify eight patterns of disruption: request, query, hiccup, delay, mistake, flaw, breakdown and the unexpected. The paper also contributes a disruption ripple model, and identifies five tensions in responding to disruptions: competing priorities, dealing with difficult others, mismatching expectations, shouldering responsibility and reluctant assistance. The patterns of disruption provide a more nuanced way of understanding deviating incidents in service situations. The suggested ripple model allows conceptual exploration of focal service providing actor’s network activation when faced with disruptive situations. The identified tensions illustrate the underlying complexities in network relationships and how these tensions might affect the overall response to incidents. We argue that service providing organisations need to address the development of relationships to support beneficial value outcomes. This paper also methodologically contributes with a modified Critical Incident Technique augmented with a generative actor mapping activity.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press, 2020. Vol. 173, p. 65-65
Series
Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings, ISSN 1650-3686, E-ISSN 1650-3740 ; 173
Keywords [en]
SERVICE DESIGN, DISRUPTION RIPPLE MODEL, SERVICE FAILURE, CRITICAL INCIDENT TECHNIQUE, HEALTHCARE
National Category
Design
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-165457ISBN: 9789179297794 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-165457DiVA, id: diva2:1428054
Conference
ServDes.2020 Tensions, Paradoxes + Plurality, 2-5th February 2021, Melbourne, Australia
Funder
EU, Horizon 2020, 992126Available from: 2020-05-04 Created: 2020-05-04 Last updated: 2026-02-05
In thesis
1. Designing for Resilience: Navigating Change in Service Systems
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Designing for Resilience: Navigating Change in Service Systems
2020 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Services are prone to change in the form of expected and unexpected variations and disruptions, more so given the increasing interconnectedness and complexity of service systems today. These changes require service systems to be resilient and designed to adapt, to ensure that services continue to work smoothly. This thesis problematises the prevailing view and assumptions underpinning the current understanding of resilience in services.  Drawing on literature from service management, service design, systems thinking and social-ecological resilience theory, this work investigates how service design can foster resilience in service systems. Supported by empirical input from three research projects in healthcare, the findings show service design can contribute to the adaptability and transformability of service systems through its holistic, human-centred, participatory and experimental approaches. Through the analysis, this research identifies key intervention points for cultivating service systems resilience through service design, including the design of service interactions, processes, enabling structures and multi-level governance. The study makes two important contributions. First, it extends the understanding of service systems resilience as the collective capacity for intentional action in responding to ongoing change, coordinated across scales in order to create value. This is supported by offering alternative assumptions about resilience in service.  Second, it positions service design as an enabler of service resilience by explicitly linking design practice(s) to processes that contribute to resilience. By extending the understanding of service systems resilience, this thesis lays the groundwork for future research at the intersection of service design, systemic change and resilience.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press, 2020. p. 137
Series
Linköping Studies in Science and Technology. Dissertations, ISSN 0345-7524 ; 2065
Keywords
service design, service systems, resilience, value creation, systemic design
National Category
Business Administration Social Sciences Economics and Business Design
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-165087 (URN)10.3384/diss.diva-165087 (DOI)9789179298678 (ISBN)
Public defence
2020-06-09, Ada Lovelace, B-Building, Campus Valla, Linköping, 13:15 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Funder
EU, Horizon 2020, 992126The Kamprad Family Foundation, 302131
Available from: 2020-05-05 Created: 2020-05-05 Last updated: 2025-02-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Paper

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Rodrigues, VanessaHolmlid, StefanBlomkvist, Johan
By organisation
Human-Centered systemsFaculty of Science & Engineering
Design

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 452 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf