liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Do we Read what we Share? Analyzing the Click Dynamic of News Articles Shared on Twitter
Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.
Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.
Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.
Linköping University, Department of Computer and Information Science, Database and information techniques. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.
Show others and affiliations
2019 (English)In: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 IEEE/ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN SOCIAL NETWORKS ANALYSIS AND MINING (ASONAM 2019), Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 2019, p. 420-425Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

News and information spread over social media can have big impact on thoughts, beliefs, and opinions. It is therefore important to understand the sharing dynamics on these forums. However, most studies trying to capture these dynamics rely only on Twitters open APIs to measure how frequently articles are shared/retweeted, and therefore do not capture how many users actually read the articles linked in these tweets. To address this problem, in this paper, we first develop a novel measurement methodology, which combines the Twitter steaming API, the Bitly API, and careful sample rate selection to simultaneously collect and analyze the timeline of both the number of retweets and clicks generated by news article links. Second, we present a temporal analysis of the news cycle based on five-day-long traces (containing both clicks and retweet over time) for the news article links discovered during a seven-day period. Among other things, our analysis highlights differences in the relative timelines observed for clicks and retweets (e.g., retweet data often lags and underestimates the bias towards reading popular links/articles), and helps answer important questions regarding differences in how age-based biases and churn affect how frequently news articles shared on Twitter are accessed over time.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 2019. p. 420-425
Series
IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), ISSN 2473-9928, E-ISSN 2473-991X
Keywords [en]
Social media; News and information sharing; Temporal click dynamics; Twitter; Bitly
National Category
Computer and Information Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-169299DOI: 10.1145/3341161.3342933ISI: 000555683800063ISBN: 978-1-4503-6868-1 (electronic)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-169299DiVA, id: diva2:1466560
Conference
IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), Vancouver, CANADA, aug 27-30, 2019
Available from: 2020-09-12 Created: 2020-09-12 Last updated: 2025-02-18

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Carlsson, Niklas

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Holmstrom, JesperJonsson, DanielPolbratt, FilipNilsson, OlavLundström, LinneaRagnarsson, SebastianForsberg, AntonAndersson, KarlCarlsson, Niklas
By organisation
Faculty of Science & EngineeringDatabase and information techniques
Computer and Information Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 97 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf