liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Digital inclusion in a disadvantaged Swedish suburb: Trust and participation to form Quality of Government
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Political Science. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9905-0942
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Political Science. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3671-350X
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Political Science. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Logistics & Quality Management. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4730-5453
2021 (English)In: 54th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS 2021, IEEE Computer Society, 2021, p. 2389-2398Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Digital inclusion is the key for a sustainable andinclusive society. In particular, digital governmentalservices must be impartial, inclusive and available foreveryone eligible for the services. Digital inclusion is akey for trust of government in a more digital society.However, the motives access, use and competences to bedigital included varies in line with other forms socioeconomicstratification. It is also complicated to reachthose who are digital excluded in traditional surveymethods. This paper presents a field study on digitalinclusion in a disadvantaged Swedish suburb, where wemade a structured interview survey to reach groups thatare usually hard to survey. The analysis shows thatthose who find it easy to search on the Internet alsoexperience more inclusion in the Swedish society. Inaddition, more advanced use as on-line payments anduse of eID seems to increase the trust in publicauthorities. Thereby, digital inclusion can be seen as afactor enhancing even quality of government, that hasto be further investigated.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
IEEE Computer Society, 2021. p. 2389-2398
Series
Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, E-ISSN 1530-1605 ; 2020
National Category
Public Administration Studies Information Systems, Social aspects
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-175018DOI: 10.24251/HICSS.2021.292ISI: 001300419502045Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85108342454OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-175018DiVA, id: diva2:1544565
Conference
Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2021, Maui, HI, JAN 04-08, 2021
Funder
Swedish Research Council Formas, 2018-02366
Note

Funding Agencies|Swedish Research council FORMAS [2018-02366]; Formas [2018-02366] Funding Source: Formas

Available from: 2021-04-15 Created: 2021-04-15 Last updated: 2025-11-14Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Access without inclusion: Practising social rights and responsibilities in disadvantaged neighbourhoods of a digital welfare state
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Access without inclusion: Practising social rights and responsibilities in disadvantaged neighbourhoods of a digital welfare state
2025 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Alternative title[sv]
Tillgång utan inkludering : Att utöva sociala rättigheter och skyldigheter i utsatta områden i en digital välfärdsstat
Abstract [en]

This compilation thesis problematises challenges of inclusion in the Swedish welfare state, which delivers welfare services through digital government. This is done by analysing individuals’ practices of social rights and responsibilities among residents in multi-ethnic and socioeconomically weaker neighbourhoods. The analysis pays particular attention to people’s individual capabilities that enable such practices. The study builds on four papers.

The utilisation of digital government comes with ambitions of inclusion and efficiency to strengthen democracy, support citizens’ rights and participation, and provide access to public services. However, this is not always the case. Instead, through digital divides, exclusion is increasing and altering how people use welfare services, interact with the government, and exercise their citizenship rights and responsibilities. Digital inequalities pose a barrier for the welfare state to uphold its ambitions. This thesis develops a theoretical framework grounded in theories of citizenship and digital citizenship, incorporating digital inclusion, administrative literacy, and language proficiency.

This thesis focuses on how increasing socioeconomic inequalities and digitalisation are expressed among inhabitants in segregated neighbourhoods with lower income, education, and a higher share of migrants with refugee backgrounds. It examines this in the context of public provision delivered through digital services. Analysing the experiences of residents in vulnerable neighbourhoods presents methodological challenges of representation and measurement, including linguistic barriers, social desirability bias, recruitment challenges, and issues of trust. Therefore, this thesis draws on an immersive sequential mixed-methods field study conducted in two diverse Swedish neighbourhoods. It includes field visits, a survey, observations, focus groups, and interviews with both residents and professionals working in or with these deprived neighbourhoods.

By studying a hard-to-survey population, residents in disadvantaged neighbourhoods, the thesis not only contributes to the lack of data and methods for gathering this data but also problematises theoretical understandings of (digital) citizenship and inclusion. It shows that citizenship inclusion in a (digital) welfare state depends on the interplay of social rights, responsibilities and practices. While formal rights and responsibilities enable access and legal inclusion, meaningful inclusion requires the practice of them, which depends on people’s individual capabilities and practised inclusion. The thesis highlights residents’ challenges in practising social rights and responsibilities through the use of public digital services, mainly due to a lack of digital skills, administrative literacy, and language proficiency.

Abstract [sv]

Denna sammanläggningsavhandling problematiserar inkludering i den svenska välfärdsstaten, som tillhandahåller offentliga tjänster digitalt. Problematiseringen bygger på en analys av hur sociala rättigheter och skyldigheter utövas genom användningen av digitala välfärdstjänster bland boende i bostadsområden med socioekonomiska utmaningar. Analysen riktar särskild uppmärksamhet mot individers förmågor som möjliggör utövandet av rättigheterna och skyldigheterna. Studien bygger på fyra papper.

Digitalisering i offentlig sektor präglas av ambitionen att öka inkludering och effektivitet för att stärka demokratin, främja medborgares rättigheter och delaktighet, samt öka tillgången till offentliga tjänster. Detta är dock inte alltid utfallet. Genom digitala klyftor ökar i stället exkluderingen. Digitaliseringen förändrar hur människor använder välfärdstjänster, interagerar med offentliga verksamheter och utövar sina medborgerliga rättigheter och skyldigheter. Digitala ojämlikheter försvårar i sin tur välfärdsstatens möjligheter att upprätthålla sina ambitioner. Avhandlingen utvecklar därför en teoretisk ram baserad på teorier om medborgarskap och digitalt medborgarskap, där digital inkludering och kunskap om offentlig förvaltning ingår.

Studien fokuserar på hur växande socioekonomiska ojämlikheter och digitalisering tar sig uttryck bland invånare i segregerade bostadsområden med lägre inkomst, utbildningsnivå och en högre andel migranter med flyktingbakgrund. Detta undersöks i relation till offentliga tjänster som tillhandahålls digitalt. Att studera invånares erfarenheter i utsatta områden innebär metodologiska utmaningar som till exempel språkliga hinder, svårigheter att rekrytera respondenter och informanter, samt bristande tillit. Avhandlingen bygger därför på en omfattande fältstudie som blandar kvantitativa och kvalitativa metoder i två svenska marginaliserade bostadsområden. Metoden omfattar fältstudier, enkätundersökning, observationer, fokusgrupper och intervjuer med både invånare och yrkesverksamma i dessa områden.

Genom att studera en förbisedd grupp, invånare i socioekonomiskt utsatta områden, bidrar avhandlingen inte bara till att adressera bristen på data och metoder för att samla in sådan data, utan problematiserar också teoretiska förståelser av (digitalt) medborgarskap och inkludering. Studien visar att inkludering i en (digital) välfärdsstat beror på samspelet mellan sociala rättigheter, skyldigheter och utövandet av dem. Formella rättigheter och skyldigheter möjliggör tillgång, men en fullständig inkludering förutsätter att dessa också utövas, vilket i sin tur baseras på individers förmågor. Avhandlingen synliggör invånares utmaningar i att utöva sociala rättigheter och skyldigheter genom användningen av offentliga digitala tjänster, framför allt till följd av bristande digitala kompetenser, språkkunskaper och kunskap om offentliga förvaltning.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press, 2025. p. 116
Series
Linköping Studies in Arts and Sciences, ISSN 0282-9800 ; 922
Keywords
Digital divides, Vulnerable neighbourhoods, Citizenship, Public digital services, Welfare state, Digitala klyftor, Utsatta bostadsområden, Medborgarskap, Offentliga digitala tjänster, Välfärdsstaten
National Category
Political Science (Excluding Peace and Conflict Studies)
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-219424 (URN)10.3384/9789181183108 (DOI)9789181183092 (ISBN)9789181183108 (ISBN)
Public defence
2025-12-12, ACAS, A Building, Campus Valla, Linköping, 10:15 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Note

Funding agency: Formas (reference numbers 2018-02366 and 2022-00015)

Available from: 2025-11-14 Created: 2025-11-14 Last updated: 2025-11-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Kulanovic, Aneta

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wihlborg, ElinKaharevic, AhmedKulanovic, AnetaElg, Mattias
By organisation
Political ScienceFaculty of Arts and SciencesLogistics & Quality ManagementFaculty of Science & Engineering
Public Administration StudiesInformation Systems, Social aspects

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 797 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf