liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Considering Sex as a Biological Variable in Preclinical Research
Office of Research on Women's Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Division of Cancer Biology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience Institute, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Show others and affiliations
2017 (English)In: The FASEB Journal, ISSN 0892-6638, E-ISSN 1530-6860, Vol. 31, no 1, p. 29-34Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In June 2015, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) released a Guide notice (NOT-OD-15–102) that highlighted the expectation of the NIH that the possible role of sex as a biologic variable be factored into research design, analyses, and reporting of vertebrate animal and human studies. Anticipating these guidelines, the NIH Office of Research on Women's Health, in October 2014, convened key stakeholders to discuss methods and techniques for integrating sex as a biologic variable in preclinical research. The workshop focused on practical methods, experimental design, and approaches to statistical analyses in the use of both male and female animals, cells, and tissues in preclinical research. Workshop participants also considered gender as a modifier of biology. This article builds on the workshop and is meant as a guide to preclinical investigators as they consider methods and techniques for inclusion of both sexes in preclinical research and is not intended to prescribe exhaustive/specific approaches for compliance with the new NIH policy.—Miller, L. R., Marks, C., Becker, J.B., Hurn, P.D., Chen, W.-J., Woodruff, T., McCarthy, M.M., Sohrabji, F., Schiebinger, L., Wetherington, C.L., Makris, S., Arnold, A. P., Einstein, G., Miller, V. M., Sandberg, K., Maier, S., Cornelison, T. L., Clayton, J. A. Considering sex as a biological variable in preclinical research. FASEB J. 31, 29–34 (2017) www.fasebj.org 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2017. Vol. 31, no 1, p. 29-34
National Category
Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-176338DOI: 10.1096/fj.201600781rISI: 000392177600006PubMedID: 27682203Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85009732706OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-176338DiVA, id: diva2:1563315
Available from: 2021-06-09 Created: 2021-06-09 Last updated: 2021-07-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Einstein, Gillian

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Einstein, Gillian
In the same journal
The FASEB Journal
Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 28 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf