liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
How should sensory function in the oropharynx be tested? Cold thermal testing; a comparison of the methods of levels and limits
ENT Clinic, Ryhov County Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1192-0182
Linköping University, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Nursing Science. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Östergötlands Läns Landsting, Anaesthetics, Operations and Specialty Surgery Center, Department of Clinical Neurophysiology. School of Health Sciences, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0433-0619
Linköping University, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Clinical Neurophysiology. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Östergötlands Läns Landsting, Anaesthetics, Operations and Specialty Surgery Center, Department of Clinical Neurophysiology.
2010 (English)In: Clinical Neurophysiology, ISSN 1388-2457, E-ISSN 1872-8952, Vol. 121, no 11, p. 1886-1889Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective

Several studies indicate an upper airway peripheral neuropathy in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). The sensation of cold, as measured by cold detection thresholds (CDT), in the oropharynx has been shown to be compromised in patients with sleep apnea and, to a lesser extent, habitual snoring. To reveal whether this neuropathy is part of the pathogenetic process of OSAS, longitudinal studies of snorers are needed. The objective of the present study was to establish the test–retest repeatability for the two most commonly used thermal testing methods: the reaction time exclusive method of levels (MLE) and the method of limits (MLI).

Methods

Forty non-snoring subjects were tested at the soft palate and the lip at two separate occasions (mean interval 45 days) using a Medoc TSA – 2001 equipment with an intra-oral thermode.

Results

With MLE mean CDT’s were lower for both the lip and soft palate than with MLI. However, MLI showed a better test–retest repeatability (r = 2.2 vs. 2.6) for the soft palate.

Conclusions

MLI should be used in longitudinal studies. The performance of this method is also faster.

Significance

We have established a quick, safe and reliable method suitable for longitudinal studies of peripheral neuropathy in sleep apnea pathogenesis.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2010. Vol. 121, no 11, p. 1886-1889
Keywords [en]
Cold thermal testing, Oropharynx, Method of levels, Method of limits, Quantitative sensory testing, Obstructive sleep apnea
National Category
Otorhinolaryngology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-181260DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.05.002ISI: 000282158200013PubMedID: 20605521Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-77956936921OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-181260DiVA, id: diva2:1613834
Note

Grants have been received for this project from the Swedish Heart Lung Foundation and Futurum - the Academy for Healthcare, County Council, Jonkoping, Sweden.

Available from: 2021-11-23 Created: 2021-11-23 Last updated: 2024-01-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sunnergren, OlaBroström, AndersSvanborg, Eva
By organisation
Nursing ScienceFaculty of Health SciencesDepartment of Clinical NeurophysiologyClinical Neurophysiology
In the same journal
Clinical Neurophysiology
Otorhinolaryngology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 26 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf