liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Association Between beta-Blockers and Outcomes in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Current Insights From the SwedeHF Registry
Univ Minnesota, MN USA.
Univ Basel, Switzerland; Univ Basel, Switzerland.
Karolinska Inst, Sweden.
Karolinska Inst, Sweden; Karolinska Univ Hosp, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: Journal of Cardiac Failure, ISSN 1071-9164, E-ISSN 1532-8414, Vol. 27, no 11, p. 1165-1174Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: beta-Blockers have an uncertain effect in heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction of 50% or higher (heart failure with preserved ejection fraction [HFpEF]). Methods and results: We included patients with HFpEF from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry (SwedeHF) enrolled from 2011 through 2018. In a 2:1 propensity-score matched analysis (beta-blocker use vs nonuse), we assessed the primary outcome first HF hospitalization, the coprimary outcome cardiovascular (CV) death, and the secondary outcomes of all-cause hospitalization and all-cause death. We performed intention-to-treat and a per-protocol consistency analyses. There were a total of 14,434 patients (median age 79 years, IQR 71-85 years, 51% women); 80% were treated with a beta-blocker at baseline. Treated patients were younger and had higher rates of atrial fibrillation and coronary artery disease, and higher N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels. In the 4412:2206 patient matched cohort, at 5 years, 42% (95% CI 40%-44%) vs 44% (95% CI 41%-47%) had a HF admission and 38% (IQR 36%-40%) vs 40% (IQR 36%-42%) died from CV causes. In the intention-to-treat analysis, beta-blocker use was not associated with HF admissions (hazard ratio 0.95 [95% CI 0.87-1.05, P = .31]) or CV death (hazard ratio 0.94 [95% CI 0.85-1.03, P = .19]). In the subgroup analyses, men seemed to have a more favorable association between beta-blockers and outcomes than did women. There were no associations between beta-blocker use and secondary outcomes. Conclusions: In patients with HFpEF, beta-blocker use is common but not associated with changes in HF hospitalization or cardiovascular mortality. In the absence of a strong rational and randomized control trials the case for beta-blockers in HFpEF remains inconclusive. Bullet points: The effect of beta-blockers with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction of 50% or greater is uncertain. In a propensity score-matched heart failure with preserved ejection fraction analysis in the SwedeHF registry, beta-blockers were not associated with a change in risk for heart failure admissions or cardiovascular deaths. Lay summary: The optimal treatment for heart failure with a preserved pump function remains unknown. Despite the lack of scientific studies, beta-blockers are very commonly used. When matching patients with a similar risk profile in a large heart failure registry, the use of beta-blockers for the treatment of heart failure with a preserved pump function was not associated with any changes in heart failure hospital admissions or cardiovascular death.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE INC MEDICAL PUBLISHERS , 2021. Vol. 27, no 11, p. 1165-1174
National Category
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-181488DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2021.04.015ISI: 000718012900002PubMedID: 33971289OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-181488DiVA, id: diva2:1616135
Note

Funding Agencies|EU/EFPIA Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking BigData@Heart grant [116074]; Swedish Research CouncilSwedish Research CouncilEuropean Commission [523-2014-2336]; Swedish Heart Lung FoundationSwedish Heart-Lung Foundation [20150557, 20170841, R01 HL-122744]; National Institutes of HealthUnited States Department of Health & Human ServicesNational Institutes of Health (NIH) - USA

Available from: 2021-12-02 Created: 2021-12-02 Last updated: 2025-02-10

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Dahlström, Ulf
By organisation
Division of Diagnostics and Specialist MedicineFaculty of Medicine and Health SciencesDepartment of Cardiology in Linköping
In the same journal
Journal of Cardiac Failure
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 18 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf