liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Operational message
There are currently operational disruptions. Troubleshooting is in progress.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Time to Hemorrhage Control in a Hybrid ER System: Is It Time to Change?
Our Lady Lake Reg Med Ctr, LA USA.
Our Lady Lake Reg Med Ctr, LA USA.
Univ Estadual Campinas, Brazil.
Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, TX 77030 USA.
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: Shock, ISSN 1073-2322, E-ISSN 1540-0514, Vol. 56, no 1S, p. 16-21Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Time to hemorrhage control is critical, as mortality in patients with severe hemorrhage that arrive to trauma centers with sign of life remains over 40%. Prompt identification and management of severe hemorrhage is paramount to reducing mortality. In traditional US trauma systems, the early hospital course of a severely hemorrhaging patient typically proceeds from the trauma resuscitation bay to the operating room or angiography suite with a potential stop for radiological imaging. This protracted journey can prove fatal as it consumes valuable minutes. In contrast to the current US system is a newly developed and increasingly adopted system in Japan called the hybrid emergency room system (HERS). The hybrid ER is equipped to allow resuscitation, imaging, and damage control intervention to occur in the ER without the need to transport the patient to a subsequent destination. The HERS is relatively new and remains restricted to a small number of institutions, limiting the ability to robustly examine impact(s) on patient outcomes. Even if proven to yield superior outcomes, there are significant obstacles to adopting the HERS in the US. Challenges such as the high cost of building and implementing a HER system, return on investment, and the significant differences between the US and Japan in terms of physician training, trauma center, and reimbursement schemes may render the hybrid ER system to be unfeasible in most current trauma centers. Barriers aside, the Japanese hybrid ER system remains the most novel recent advancement in the quest to reduce potentially preventable mortality from hemorrhage.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS , 2021. Vol. 56, no 1S, p. 16-21
Keywords [en]
Damage control resuscitation; hybrid emergency room; noncompressible torso hemorrhage; resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA)
National Category
Anesthesiology and Intensive Care
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-181661DOI: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001539ISI: 000720520000005PubMedID: 32205794OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-181661DiVA, id: diva2:1617630
Available from: 2021-12-07 Created: 2021-12-07 Last updated: 2021-12-07

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Pirouzram, Artai
By organisation
Division of Diagnostics and Specialist MedicineFaculty of Medicine and Health SciencesDepartment of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery
In the same journal
Shock
Anesthesiology and Intensive Care

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 81 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf