liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Validation of a feature-based likelihood ratio method for the SAILR software. Part II: Elemental compositional data for comparison of glass samples
Natl Forens Ctr, SE-58194 Linkoping, Sweden.
Linköping University, Department of Computer and Information Science, The Division of Statistics and Machine Learning. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Natl Forens Ctr, SE-58194 Linkoping, Sweden.
2022 (English)In: FORENSIC CHEMISTRY, ISSN 2468-1709, Vol. 27, article id 100385Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

SAILR is open-source software designed to calculate forensic likelihood ratios (LR) from probability distributions of reference data. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate validation of a multivariate feature-based LR method for SAILR using compositional data on glass fragments. Validation was performed using designated performance characteristics, e.g., accuracy, discrimination, and calibration. These characteristics were measured using performance metrics such as cost of the log likelihood ratio and equal error rate. The LR method was developed simultaneously to a baseline method having features less discriminating, but being better aligned with the normality assumption for within-source variation. The baseline method served as the floor of acceptable performance. The results showed that the available data supported LR methods using three elemental features or less. Best performance was obtained using calcium, magnesium, and silicon. The within-source variation in elemental features was slightly leptokurtic (heavy-tailed), violating the assumption of normality. The data were therefore normalized using Lambert W transformation and the performance of the LR method using normalized data was compared with that using non-normalized data. Although performance improved with normalization, the difference was small. Limits of LR output were set to 1/512 < LR < 158 using the empirical lower and upper boundaries (ELUB) LR method. This limited range was primarily a consequence of notable within-source variation. By passing the tests of normality and outperforming the baseline method, the method was considered valid for use in SAILR for data relevant to the background data set, using the defined range of LRs.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
ELSEVIER , 2022. Vol. 27, article id 100385
Keywords [en]
Likelihood ratio; Validation; Strength of evidence; SEM-EDX; Glass
National Category
Bioinformatics and Computational Biology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-181755DOI: 10.1016/j.forc.2021.100385ISI: 000725708200003OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-181755DiVA, id: diva2:1619279
Available from: 2021-12-13 Created: 2021-12-13 Last updated: 2025-02-07

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Nordgaard, Anders
By organisation
The Division of Statistics and Machine LearningFaculty of Arts and Sciences
Bioinformatics and Computational Biology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 130 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf