liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Base of tongue squamous cell carcinomas, outcome depending on treatment strategy and p16 status: A population-based study from the Swedish Head and Neck Cancer Register
Reg Vastra Gotaland, Sweden.
Reg Vastra Gotaland, Sweden; Sahlgrens Acad, Sweden.
Univ Gothenburg, Sweden; Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Sweden.
Orebro Univ Hosp, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: Acta Oncologica, ISSN 0284-186X, E-ISSN 1651-226X, Vol. 61, no 4, p. 433-440Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background The base of tongue squamous cell carcinoma (BOTSCC) is mainly an HPV-related tumor. Radiotherapy (EBRT) +/- concomitant chemotherapy (CT) is the backbone of the curatively intended treatment, with brachytherapy (BT) boost as an option. With four different treatment strategies in Sweden, a retrospective study based on the population-based Swedish Head and Neck Cancer Register (SweHNCR) was initiated. Material and methods Data on tumors, treatment and outcomes in patients with BOTSCC treated between 2008 and 2014 were validated through medical records and updated as needed. Data on p16 status were updated or completed with immunohistochemical analysis of archived tumor material. Tumors were reclassified according to the UICC 8th edition. Results Treatment was EBRT, EBRT + CT, EBRT + BT or EBRT + CT + BT in 151, 145, 82 and 167 patients respectively (n = 545). A p16 analysis was available in 414 cases; 338 were p16+ and 76 p16-. 5-year overall survival (OS) was 68% (95% CI: 64-72%), with76% and 37% for p16+ patients and p16- patients, respectively. An increase in OS was found with the addition of CT to EBRT for patients with p16+ tumors, stages II-III, but for patients with tumor stage I, p16+ (UICC 8) none of the treatment strategies was superior to EBRT alone. Conclusion In the present retrospective population-based study of BOTSCC brachytherapy was found to be of no beneficial value in curatively intended treatment. An increase in survival was found for EBRT + CT compared to EBRT alone in patients with advanced cases, stages II and III (UICC 8), but none of the regimes was significantly superior to EBRT as a single treatment modality for stage I (UICC 8), provided there was p16 positivity in the tumor. In the small group of patients with p16- tumors, a poorer prognosis was found, but the small sample size did not allow any comparisons between different treatment strategies.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD , 2022. Vol. 61, no 4, p. 433-440
Keywords [en]
Base of tongue cancer; HPV; survival; radiotherapy; brachytherapy
National Category
Cancer and Oncology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-182746DOI: 10.1080/0284186X.2022.2027516ISI: 000747591700001PubMedID: 35081863OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-182746DiVA, id: diva2:1636611
Note

Funding Agencies|Stiftelsen Laryngfonden, Sweden

Available from: 2022-02-10 Created: 2022-02-10 Last updated: 2023-03-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Farnebo, Lovisa

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Farnebo, Lovisa
By organisation
Division of Sensory Organs and CommunicationFaculty of Medicine and Health SciencesDepartment of OtorhinolaryngologyDepartment of Hand and Plastic Surgery
In the same journal
Acta Oncologica
Cancer and Oncology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 121 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf