liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders in children and adolescents: An international Delphi study-Part 2-Development of Axis II
Univ Naples Feder II, Italy.
Malmö Univ, Sweden.
Region Östergötland, Public Dental Health Care, Center for Oral Rehabilitation Norrköping. Malmö Univ, Sweden.
Scandinavian Ctr Orofacial Neurosci, Sweden; Minist Hlth, Saudi Arabia.
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, E-ISSN 1365-2842, Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, ISSN 0305-182X, Vol. 49, no 5, p. 541-552Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background Unlike the psychosocial assessment established for adults in the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD), a standardised psychosocial assessment for children and adolescents with TMD complaints has not yet been established. Objectives To develop a new standardised instrument set to assess the psychosocial functioning in children and adolescents by adapting the psychosocial status and pain-related disability (Axis II) of the adult DC/TMD and by including new instruments. Methods A modified Delphi method was used to survey 23 international TMD experts and four international experts in pain-related psychological factors for consensus regarding assessment tools for psychosocial functioning and pain-related disability in children and adolescents. The TMD experts reviewed 29 Axis II statements at round 1, 13 at round 2 and 2 at round 3. Agreement was set at 80% for first-round consensus level and 70% for each of the second and third rounds. The psychological experts completed a complementary Delphi survey to reach a consensus on tools to use to assess more complex psychological domains in children and adolescents. For the psychological experts, the first round included 10 open-ended questions on preferred screening tools for depression, anxiety, catastrophising, sleep problems and stress in children (ages 6-9 years old) and adolescents (ages 10-19 years old) as well as on other domains suggested for investigation. In the second round, the psychological experts received a 9-item questionnaire to prioritise the suggested instruments from most to least recommended. Results The TMD experts, after three Delphi rounds, reached consensus on the changes of DC/TMD to create a form to evaluate Axis II in children and adolescents with TMD complaints. The psychological experts added tools to assess depression and anxiety, sleep disorders, catastrophising, stress and resilience. Conclusion Through international expert consensus, this study adapted Axis II of the adult DC/TMD to assess psychosocial functioning and pain-related disability in children and adolescents. The adapted Axis II protocols will be validated in the target populations.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
WILEY , 2022. Vol. 49, no 5, p. 541-552
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-183401DOI: 10.1111/joor.13301ISI: 000759532100001PubMedID: 34951729Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85125070022OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-183401DiVA, id: diva2:1643542
Note

Funding Agencies|International Network for Orofacial pain and Related disorders Methodology (INfORM) Group; International Association for Dental Research

Available from: 2022-03-10 Created: 2022-03-10 Last updated: 2025-09-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Nilsson, Ing-Marie
By organisation
Center for Oral Rehabilitation Norrköping
In the same journal
Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 50 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf