liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Så vill vi organisera vårdcentraler 838 allmänläkares inställning – de flesta positiva till personlig patientlista om den är rimligt stor: [How do we want to organize health centres? 838 Swedish general practitioners attitudes to a personal patient list]
Primärvårdens FoU-enhet, Futurum, Region Jönköpings län, Sverige.
Primärvårdens FoU-enhet, Futurum, Region Jönköpings län, Sverige.
Uppsala universitet, Sverige.
Linköping University, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences.
2021 (English)In: Läkartidningen, ISSN 0023-7205, E-ISSN 1652-7518, Vol. 118Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

How do we want to organize health centres? 838Swedish general practitioners’ attitudes to a personal patient list.

In Swedish primary care patients are registered at health centres where different professions, such as general practitioners (GPs), nurses, assistant nurses, counsellors, physiotherapists, psychologists and biomedical analysts, work. In an international comparison personal physician continuity is low in Sweden. Several governmental inquiries propose that patients register with one GP or a care team. Do Swedish GPs want a personal patient list and how should this best be realised? A web survey was distributed to the members of the Swedish Union of General Practitioners and was answered by 838 GPs. 91% wanted a personal patient list if reasonably sized, the option to limit their list, and shared responsibility for the list with colleagues or a team. To be able to plan the working day themselves and designated time for collegial dialogue was considered essential for increased efficiency, well-being and reduced risk of patients harm due to their doctor's knowledge gaps.

Abstract [sv]

Sverige presterar i internationell jämförelse sämst avseende personlig läkarkontinuitet. Personliga patientlistor kan öka kontinuiteten, men vad tycker svenska allmänläkare?

838 allmänläkare besvarade en webbenkät. 91 procent av svarande under 66 år önskade en personlig patientlista om den är rimligt stor, ca 1 160 personer. Ansvaret för listan bör delas inom ett arbetslag av läkare eller ett team. Tid för kollegial dialog är nödvändig för effektivitet, trivsel och patientsäkerhet.

Sverige skulle behöva 11 150 allmänläkare. I dag finns 5 000. Radikala satsningar för rekrytering av läkare till primärvården krävs, liksom övergångslösningar, till exempel listning på andra specialister och på team.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sveriges Läkarförbund , 2021. Vol. 118
National Category
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-185086PubMedID: 34033113OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-185086DiVA, id: diva2:1658768
Available from: 2022-05-17 Created: 2022-05-17 Last updated: 2022-06-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

PubMedLink to publication

Authority records

Borgquist, Lars

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Borgquist, Lars
By organisation
Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community MedicineFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences
In the same journal
Läkartidningen
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 81 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf