liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A collaborative comparison of international pediatric diabetes registries
Univ Ulm, Germany; German Ctr Diabet Res DZD, Germany.
Northern Adelaide Local Hlth Network, Australia.
Steno Diabet Ctr Copenhagen, Denmark; Danish Diabet Acad, Denmark.
Univ Oslo, Norway; Oslo Univ Hosp, Norway.
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: Pediatric Diabetes, ISSN 1399-543X, E-ISSN 1399-5448, Vol. 23, no 6, p. 627-640Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background An estimated 1.1 million children and adolescents aged under 20 years have type 1 diabetes worldwide. Principal investigators from seven well-established longitudinal pediatric diabetes registries and the SWEET initiative have come together to provide an international collaborative perspective and comparison of the registries. Work Flow Information and data including registry characteristics, pediatric participant clinical characteristics, data availability and data completeness from the Australasian Diabetes Data Network (ADDN), Danish Registry of Childhood and Adolescent Diabetes (DanDiabKids), Diabetes prospective follow-up registry (DPV), Norwegian Childhood Diabetes Registry (NCDR), National Paediatric Diabetes Audit (NPDA), Swedish Childhood Diabetes Registry (Swediabkids), T1D Exchange Quality Improvement Collaborative (T1DX-QI), and the SWEET initiative was extracted up until 31 December 2020. Registry Objectives and Outcomes The seven diabetes registries and the SWEET initiative collectively show data of more than 900 centers and around 100,000 pediatric patients, the majority with type 1 diabetes. All share the common objectives of monitoring treatment and longitudinal outcomes, promoting quality improvement and equality in diabetes care and enabling clinical research. All generate regular benchmark reports. Main differences were observed in the definition of the pediatric population, the inclusion of adults, documentation of CGM metrics and collection of raw data files as well as linkage to other data sources. The open benchmarking and access to regularly updated data may prove to be the most important contribution from registries. This study describes aspects of the registries to enable future collaborations and to encourage the development of new registries where they do not exist.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
WILEY , 2022. Vol. 23, no 6, p. 627-640
Keywords [en]
benchmarking; diabetes mellitus; network; quality improvement; registry
National Category
Endocrinology and Diabetes
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-185827DOI: 10.1111/pedi.13362ISI: 000802867200001PubMedID: 35561091Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85133291636&OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-185827DiVA, id: diva2:1669975
Available from: 2022-06-15 Created: 2022-06-15 Last updated: 2023-03-20

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Åkesson, Karin
By organisation
Division of Children's and Women's HealthFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences
In the same journal
Pediatric Diabetes
Endocrinology and Diabetes

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 133 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf