liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The rectal remnant after total colectomy for colitis – intra-operative, post-operative and longer-term considerations
Department of Colorectal Surgery, Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6808-371x
Department of Colorectal Surgery, Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Department of Colorectal Surgery, Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Department of Colorectal Surgery, Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Show others and affiliations
2018 (English)In: Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, ISSN 0036-5521, E-ISSN 1502-7708, Vol. 53, no 12, p. 1443-1452Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objectives: Acute severe colitis requires surgery in around 30% of the cases. Total colectomy with ileostomy is the standard procedure with distinct advantages to a laparoscopic approach. Less agreement exists regarding the formation or configuration of the retained rectal stump and its short-term and long-term management. In this review, aspects of management of the rectal remnant, including perioperative considerations, potential complications, medical treatment, surveillance and implications for proctectomy and reconstructive surgery are explored.

Methods: A thorough literature review exploring the PubMed and EMBASE databases was undertaken to clarify the evidence base surrounding areas of controversy in the surgical approach to acute severe colitis. In particular, focus was given to evidence surrounding management of the rectal remnant.

Results: There is a paucity of high quality evidence for optimal management of the rectal stump following colectomy, and randomised trials are lacking. Establishment of laparoscopic colectomy has been associated with distinct advantages as well as the emergence of unique considerations, including those specific to rectal remnant management.

Conclusions: Early surgical involvement and a multidisciplinary approach to the management of acute severe colitis are advocated. Laparoscopic subtotal colectomy and ileostomy should be the operation of choice, with division of the rectum at the pelvic brim leaving a closed intraperitoneal remnant. If the rectum is severely inflamed, a mucus fistula may be useful, and an indwelling rectal catheter is probably advantageous to reduce the complications associated with stump dehiscence. Patients electing not to proceed to proctectomy should undergo surveillance for dysplasia of the rectum.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Informa UK Limited , 2018. Vol. 53, no 12, p. 1443-1452
Keywords [en]
Inflammatory bowel disease; colectomy; colitis; reconstructivesurgery; rectal remnant; rectal stump; review; surveillance
National Category
Gastroenterology and Hepatology Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-192890DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2018.1529195ISI: 000456881600004PubMedID: 30451043Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85060538161OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-192890DiVA, id: diva2:1748885
Available from: 2023-04-04 Created: 2023-04-04 Last updated: 2025-02-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Landerholm, Kalle
In the same journal
Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology
Gastroenterology and HepatologySurgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 63 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf