This Research Full Paper explore inclusion in programming in primary school. Education plays a crucial role in engaging a diverse group of students with different social backgrounds and interests. Therefore, this study aims to shed light upon inclusion in programming in primary school, focusing on gender to increase the knowledge regarding inclusion in programming didactics. The following research questions have guided the study: How are programming activities designed in primary school? How do pupils approach the programming tasks given? Can any gender differences be observed, and what are the consequences for the teaching practice? The theoretical framework used to analyse the empirical material is at the intersection between multimodal social semiotics [1] and a design-oriented perspective [2]. The empirical material consists of classroom video observations. Programming lessons in grades 4-8 have been observed and videos was recorded during 2019-2020. The pupils have worked on eight different programming tasks during the lessons. Analysis of these programming activities (tasks, instructions and resources used) focusing on gender has been made. Findings show two aspects 1) interest and position and 2) representations of knowledge. Regarding interest and position, the study of programming activities shows both similarities and differences between girls’ and boys’ approach to the task. Similarities are shown regarding the learning activities. No differences in coding strategies or creativity are observed if the task has an open design. The differences are shown in the guided tasks, where boys tend to engage in the tasks from their interests rather than following instructions and girls tend to follow the instructions given by the teacher. From a gender perspective, the boys might find programming more creative and fun, and the girls might feel less engaged as their interest falls into the background. Secondly, knowledge representations might affect who is seen as an expert within the CS field. For example, in grades 4 and 5, a male voice was represented in the video clips and a guest teacher used when presenting programming activities. The resources used in the lessons can be seen as representations of knowledge. In this case, they are always connected to a social and cultural domain [3], an environment foremost represented by males in this case.