liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Operational message
There are currently operational disruptions. Troubleshooting is in progress.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Inadvertent laparoscopic lavage of perforated colon cancer: a systematic review
New York City Hlth Hosp, NY 10016 USA; New York Med Coll, NY USA.
New York City Hlth Hosp, NY 10016 USA; New York Med Coll, NY USA.
New York City Hlth Hosp, NY 10016 USA; New York Med Coll, NY USA.
Med Univ Vienna, Austria.
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: Langenbeck's archives of surgery (Print), ISSN 1435-2443, E-ISSN 1435-2451, Vol. 409, no 1, article id 35Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BackgroundAlthough laparoscopic lavage for perforated diverticulitis with peritonitis has been grabbing the headlines, it is known that the clinical presentation of peritonitis can also be caused by an underlying perforated carcinoma. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of patients undergoing inadvertent laparoscopic lavage of perforated colon cancer as well as the delay in cancer diagnosis.MethodsThe PubMed database was systematically searched to include all studies meeting inclusion criteria. Studies were screened through titles and abstracts with potentially eligible studies undergoing full-text screening. The primary endpoints of this meta-analysis were the rates of perforated colon cancer patients having undergone inadvertent laparoscopic lavage as well as the delay in cancer diagnosis. This was expressed in pooled rate % and 95% confidence intervals.ResultsEleven studies (three randomized, two prospective, six retrospective) totaling 642 patients met inclusion criteria. Eight studies reported how patients were screened for cancer and the number of patients who completed follow-up. The pooled cancer rate was 3.4% (0.9%, 5.8%) with low heterogeneity (Isquare2 = 34.02%) in eight studies. Cancer rates were 8.2% (0%, 3%) (Isquare2 = 58.2%) and 1.7% (0%, 4.5%) (Isquare2 = 0%) in prospective and retrospective studies, respectively. Randomized trials reported a cancer rate of 7.2% (3.1%, 11.2%) with low among-study heterogeneity (Isquare2 = 0%) and a median delay to diagnosis of 2 (1.5-5) months.ConclusionsThis systematic review found that 7% of patients undergoing laparoscopic lavage for peritonitis had perforated colon cancer with a delay to diagnosis of up to 5 months.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
SPRINGER , 2024. Vol. 409, no 1, article id 35
Keywords [en]
Colonic diverticulitis; Colon cancer; Colectomy; Intestinal perforation; Laparoscopy
National Category
Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-200364DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-03224-5ISI: 001139394900001PubMedID: 38197963Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85182087979OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-200364DiVA, id: diva2:1830617
Available from: 2024-01-23 Created: 2024-01-23 Last updated: 2025-08-14

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Popa, Dorin E.
By organisation
Department of Surgery in LinköpingDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical SciencesFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences
In the same journal
Langenbeck's archives of surgery (Print)
Surgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 40 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf