liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
On the edge of decision-making in trauma care: A focus group study on radiographers' experiences of interprofessional collaboration
Lulea Univ Technol, Sweden.
Lulea Univ Technol, Sweden.
Region Östergötland, Center for Diagnostics, Department of Radiology in Linköping. Lulea Univ Technol, Sweden; Vasterviks Hosp, Sweden.
Umea Univ, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2023 (English)In: Radiography, ISSN 1078-8174, E-ISSN 1532-2831, Vol. 29, no 6, p. 1123-1129Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Introduction: The temporary trauma teams in trauma alerts consist of a diverse group of unique professionals requiring interprofessional collaboration and coordination to achieve efficient, high-quality care. The uncertain situation and complex care environment impose high demands on team dynamics such as individual attitudes and team behaviours. Within interprofessional teams, interaction and coordination reflect the collective success of collaboration and the achievement of goals. Interactions with radiographers have increased in trauma teams given computed tomography's prominent role in providing crucial knowledge for decision-making in trauma care. This study aimed to explore radiographers' experiences of interprofessional collaboration during trauma alerts. Method: The study was designed with focus group methodology, including 17 radiographers participating in five focus groups, analysed with an inductive focus group analysis. Results: An overarching theme, "On the edge of decision-making", emerged along with three subthemes: "Feeling included requires acknowledgement", "Exclusion precludes shared knowledge", and "Experience and mutual awareness facilitate team interaction". Conclusions: Interprofessional collaboration from the radiographer's perspective within trauma teams requires a sense of inclusion and the ability to interact with the team. Exclusion from vital decisionmaking obstructs radiographers' comprehension of situations and thereby the interdependence in interprofessional collaboration. Implications for practice: Common platforms are needed for knowledge sharing and team practices, including radiographers' areas of responsibility and relational coordination to foster interprofessional relationships. Through these means interdependence through awareness and shared knowledge can be facilitated on trauma teams. (c) 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The College of Radiographers. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
ELSEVIER SCI LTD , 2023. Vol. 29, no 6, p. 1123-1129
Keywords [en]
Focus group; Interprofessional collaborative practice; Radiographer; Relational coordination; Shared decision-making; Shared mental model; Trauma team
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-201039DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2023.09.010ISI: 001148051200001PubMedID: 37797480OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-201039DiVA, id: diva2:1840313
Note

Funding Agencies|Lulea University of Technology

Available from: 2024-02-23 Created: 2024-02-23 Last updated: 2024-03-01

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lundvall, L. -L.
By organisation
Department of Radiology in Linköping
In the same journal
Radiography
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 23 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf