liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Operational message
There are currently operational disruptions. Troubleshooting is in progress.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Förändring av EU:s politik för energieffektivitet: Policyförändring genom intern chock och policyorienterat lärande
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Political Science. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5700-9706
2021 (Swedish)In: Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift, ISSN 0039-0747, Vol. 123, no 2, p. 267-294Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Changing EU policy on energy efficiency: Policy change through internal shock and policy-oriented learningEnergy efficiency has been highlighted as a key area to meet high ambitions in EU cli-mate policy. This paper applies the Advocacy Coalition Framework to analyse recent changes of EU policy on energy efficiency, with particular focus on provisions on indi-vidual metering and billing of thermal energy in multi-apartment buildings. This area has rendered substantial discussion for a decade, with EU provisions being substan-tially revised after successful advocacy work by the advocacy coalition opposing indi-vidual metering and billing. The study confirms recent developments of the Advocacy Coalition Framework that internal shocks are important for policy change. The policy change followed other pathways too, e.g. through policy-oriented learning. As for policy-oriented learning, it occurred in different ways, e.g. the acceptance of the core beliefs and proposals for amending the provisions on individual metering and billing put forward by the coalition opposing individual metering and billing by a majority of Member States in the Council, the European Parliament and the proponents of individual metering and billing. Besides contributing to the development of scientific theory, the knowledge provided in the paper can inform various stakeholders to bet-ter shape their future strategies in advocacy work in EU policy-making.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Fahlbeckska Stiftelsen , 2021. Vol. 123, no 2, p. 267-294
National Category
Other Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-202583OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-202583DiVA, id: diva2:1852169
Available from: 2024-04-17 Created: 2024-04-17 Last updated: 2024-04-25

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text/Förlagets fulltext

Authority records

von Malmborg, Fredrik

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
von Malmborg, Fredrik
By organisation
Political ScienceFaculty of Arts and Sciences
In the same journal
Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift
Other Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 39 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf