liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Do presenting symptoms predict treatment decisions and survival in glioblastoma? Real-world data from 1458 patients in the Swedish brain tumor registry
Linköping University, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, The Division of Cell and Neurobiology. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences.
Umeå Univ Hosp, Sweden.
Reg Canc Ctr, Sweden.
Umeå Univ Hosp, Sweden.
2024 (English)In: Neuro-Oncology Practice, ISSN 2054-2577, E-ISSN 2054-2585, Vol. 11, no 5, p. 652-659Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background Glioblastoma is the most common malignant brain tumor in adults. Non-invasive clinical parameters could play a crucial role in treatment planning and serve as predictors of patient survival. Our register-based real-life study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of presenting symptoms. Methods Data on presenting symptoms and survival, as well as known prognostic factors, were retrieved for all glioblastoma patients in Sweden registered in the Swedish Brain Tumor Registry between 2018 and 2021. The prognostic impact of different presenting symptoms was calculated using the Cox proportional hazard model. Results Data from 1458 adults with pathologically verified IDH wild-type glioblastoma were analyzed. Median survival time was 345 days. The 2-year survival rate was 21.5%. Registered presenting symptoms were focal neurological deficits, cognitive dysfunction, headache, epilepsy, signs of raised intracranial pressure, and cranial nerve symptoms, with some patients having multiple symptoms. Patients with initial cognitive dysfunction had significantly shorter survival than patients without; 265 days (245-285) vs. 409 days (365-453; P < .001). The reduced survival remained after Cox regression adjusting for known prognostic factors. Patients presenting with seizures and patients with headaches had significantly longer overall survival compared to patients without these symptoms, but the difference was not retained in multivariate analysis. Patients with cognitive deficits were less likely to have radical surgery and to receive extensive anti-neoplastic nonsurgical treatment. Conclusions This extensive real-life study reveals that initial cognitive impairment acts as an independent negative predictive factor for treatment decisions and adversely affects survival outcomes in glioblastoma patients.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
OXFORD UNIV PRESS , 2024. Vol. 11, no 5, p. 652-659
Keywords [en]
cognition; glioblastoma; prognostic factors; survival; symptoms
National Category
Neurology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-204362DOI: 10.1093/nop/npae036ISI: 001234683600001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85199031357OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-204362DiVA, id: diva2:1868745
Note

Funding Agencies|Swedish Brain Tumour Registry; National Cancer Foundation; Cancer Foundation Northern Sweden; Futurum Academy for Health and Care

Available from: 2024-06-12 Created: 2024-06-12 Last updated: 2025-03-26Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. PROGNOSTIC FACTORS FOR GLIOBLASTOMA SURVIVAL IN A CLINICAL CONTEXT: The role of presenting symptoms and treatments
Open this publication in new window or tab >>PROGNOSTIC FACTORS FOR GLIOBLASTOMA SURVIVAL IN A CLINICAL CONTEXT: The role of presenting symptoms and treatments
2025 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Glioblastoma is the most common and most malignant primary brain tumour. Survival is short, only around 15 months. This thesis explores factors influencing survival time.

The first article showed that survival was significantly prolonged in the County of Jönköping, after the implementation of a new treatment regimen in 2006. In this regimen, patients receive chemotherapy and radiotherapy concomitantly, over six weeks followed by adjuvant chemotherapy given every four weeks over six months. The study shows that survival was prolonged by 110 days.

For the second article, a review of patient records of all 189 glioblastoma patients diagnosed in the County of Jönköping 2001-2016 was performed. Patients with cognitive impairment were more difficult to diagnose, had larger tumours, and survived four months shorter than patients without cognitive impairment. If epileptic seizures were the presenting symptom, the tumours were found to be smaller at the time of diagnosis and patients lived three months longer than patients with no seizures at onset.

To further explore the difference in survival for patients with different presenting symptoms the Swedish Brain Tumour Registry (SBTR) was used in the third paper. Using the SBTR, we analysed 1458 glioblastoma patients diagnosed between 2018 and 2021. Cognitive impairment was linked to significantly shorter survival—even after adjusting for age, performance status, tumour size, MGMT methylation, surgical resection grade, and oncological treatment—while epileptic seizures initially appeared beneficial on univariate analysis but lost significance after adjustment.

The fourth study analysed 7669 glioblastoma patients from SBTR (1999–2023). Survival has improved across all age groups, almost all treatments, and regions, and analysis of relative survival demonstrated that patients primarily died from their brain tumour rather than other causes. Although initial data showed regional differences in survival, these differences diminished after adjusting for demographic data (age and sex) and tumour-related factors (preoperative performance status, tumour size), highlighting the need to control for such factors when comparing treatment outcomes between hospitals, regions and countries.

In summary, this thesis shows that while glioblastoma survival has improved over time, the overall prognosis remains poor. Patients presenting with cognitive dysfunction have a significantly shorter survival—even after adjusting for age, tumour size, and treatment—which is a novel finding. These patients are also less likely to receive oncological treatment, likely due to concerns about their understanding and ability to cope with therapy. Although earlier studies suggested that epileptic seizures at presentation were a positive prognostic factor, our larger study indicates that this association is explained by other factors. Finally, we confirm the prognostic impacts of age, tumour size, preoperative performance status, MGMT promoter methylation status (in patients treated with alkylating agents), extent of surgery, and oncological treatment.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press, 2025. p. 108
Series
Linköping University Medical Dissertations, ISSN 0345-0082 ; 1963
Keywords
Glioblastoma, Survival, Relative survival, Prognostic factors, Presenting symptoms, Cognitive impairment, Seizures at onset
National Category
Cancer and Oncology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-212630 (URN)10.3384/9789180759793 (DOI)9789180759786 (ISBN)9789180759793 (ISBN)
Public defence
2025-04-25, Aulan, Länssjukhuset Ryhov, Jönköping, 09:00
Opponent
Supervisors
Note

Funding: Gustav Lindholms stiftelse för elakartade hjärntumörer, Cancer Foundation North and Futurum.

Available from: 2025-03-26 Created: 2025-03-26 Last updated: 2025-03-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bruhn, Helena
By organisation
The Division of Cell and NeurobiologyFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences
In the same journal
Neuro-Oncology Practice
Neurology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 103 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf