Background The management of patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) requires imaging diagnostics of good quality and accurate measurement of the degree of slippage. In Sweden, three different radiological methods are commonly used: the calcar femorale method; the Billing method; and the Head-shaft angle described by Southwick.Purpose To evaluate whether any of the three most common methods used in Sweden to measure the slip angle was more useful and reproducible than the others.Material and Methods Two experienced orthopaedists measured the slip angle in preoperative hip radiographs. Intra- and inter-observer variability between the two experienced observers and the reported value by clinicians who treated the child with SCFE was evaluated.Results The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) confidence interval (CI) between the two experienced observers and the reporting clinicians overlapped for the three methods. In 37% of the cases, the difference was more than 5 degrees between the experienced observers' measurement and the reported value by clinicians. The two experienced orthopaedists' intra- and inter-observer variability was low.Conclusion The observer's experience is more important than the method of choice when measuring the slip angle in SCFE. The research group recommends the calcar femorale method due to its feasibility on the versatile and commonly used frog leg lateral view.