liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Historical Change in Trajectories of Loneliness in Old Age: Older Adults Today Are Less Lonely, but Do Not Differ in Their Age Trajectories
Linköping University, Department of Culture and Society, Division of Ageing and Social Change. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5289-3176
Max Planck Inst Human Dev, Germany.
Max Planck Inst Human Dev, Germany; Friede Springer Cardiovasc Prevent Ctr Charite, Germany.
Univ Paris 09, France.
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: Psychology and Aging, ISSN 0882-7974, E-ISSN 1939-1498, Vol. 39, no 4, p. 350-363Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

To check claims of a "loneliness epidemic," we examined whether current cohorts of older adults report higher levels and/or steeper age-related increases in loneliness than earlier-born peers. Specifically, we used 1,068 age-matched longitudinal reports (M-age observations = 79 years, 49% women) of loneliness provided by independent samples recruited in the German city of Berlin in 1990 and 2010, n = 257 participants in the Berlin Aging Study (BASE) and n = 383 participants in Berlin Aging Study II (BASE-II). Using multilevel models that orthogonalize between-person and within-person age effects, we examined how responses to items from the UCLA Loneliness Scale provided by observation-matched cohorts differed with age and across cohorts, and if those differences might be explained by a variety of individual factors. Results revealed that at age 79, the later-born BASE-II cohort reported substantially lower levels of loneliness than the earlier-born BASE cohort (d = -0.84), with cohort differences accounting for more than 14% of the variance in loneliness. Age trajectories, however, were parallel without evidence of cohort differences in rates of within-person age-related changes in loneliness. Differences in gender, education, cognitive functioning, and external control beliefs accounted for the lion's share of cohort-related differences in levels of loneliness. Results show that loneliness among older adults has shifted to markedly lower levels today, but the rate at which loneliness increases with age proceeds similarly as 2 decades ago. Future studies should investigate how psychosocial functioning across the life course is progressing in different sociohistorical contexts and in other age groups, such as younger and middle-aged adults.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC , 2024. Vol. 39, no 4, p. 350-363
Keywords [en]
loneliness; societal change; control beliefs; cognition; Berlin Aging Study I and II
National Category
Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology) Sociology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-208689DOI: 10.1037/pag0000803ISI: 001327881000005PubMedID: 38900502OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-208689DiVA, id: diva2:1907429
Available from: 2024-10-22 Created: 2024-10-22 Last updated: 2024-11-08

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Suanet, Bianca
By organisation
Division of Ageing and Social ChangeFaculty of Arts and Sciences
In the same journal
Psychology and Aging
Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology)Sociology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 69 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf