liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Principle-Based Concept Analysis Methodology Using a Phased Approach With Quality Criteria
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia;Perth Children’s Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1932-6516
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia;Perth Children’s Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3256-5407
2021 (English)In: International Journal of Qualitative Methods, E-ISSN 1609-4069, Vol. 20Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The study aimed to provide a detailed description of a process to conduct a phased principle-based concept analysis and tointroduce quality criteria assessment for a phased principle-based concept analysis. Concept analysis explores how a concept isdescribed, used and measured in the literature. This conceptual understanding is important to guide translational research todirect the development of evidence-based practice. The principle-based concept analysis is one approach of concept analysisused in published work, but the literature is lacking in articles clearly describing how to conduct it in practice. This articleprovides a methodology utilising a phased approach and by advancing on previous work; this approach includes a combination ofa systematic search, quality criteria and qualitative analysis with principle-based concept analysis. Quality criteria for a phasedprinciple-based concept analysis is introduced to critically assess articles against the four principles: epistemology, pragmatic,linguistic and logical. These improvements to the methodology promote transparency, rigour and replicability. This com-prehensive systematic approach will aid future phased principle-based concept analyses and enable future comparisons ofconcept development, advancement and related concepts to improve the evidence base.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2021. Vol. 20
National Category
Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-210206DOI: 10.1177/16094069211057995ISI: 000726772600001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85120445558OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-210206DiVA, id: diva2:1917545
Available from: 2024-12-02 Created: 2024-12-02 Last updated: 2025-05-23

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Smith, StephanieMörelius, Evalotte
In the same journal
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 32 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf