liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Operational message
There are currently operational disruptions. Troubleshooting is in progress.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Development of a novel methodology for ascertaining scientific opinion and extent of agreement
Department of Philosophy, University of Durham, Durham, United Kingdom.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5644-4290
School of Philosophy, Religion and History of Science, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Department of Philosophy, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America; School of Arts and Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3083-9179
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: PLOS ONE, E-ISSN 1932-6203, Vol. 19, no 12, article id e0313541Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

We take up the challenge of developing an international network with capacity to survey the world’s scientists on an ongoing basis, providing rich datasets regarding the opinions of scientists and scientific sub-communities, both at a time and also over time. The novel methodology employed sees local coordinators, at each institution in the network, sending survey invitation emails internally to scientists at their home institution. The emails link to a ‘10 second survey’, where the participant is presented with a single statement to consider, and a standard five-point Likert scale. In June 2023, a group of 30 philosophers and social scientists invited 20,085 scientists across 30 institutions in 12 countries to participate, gathering 6,807 responses to the statement Science has put it beyond reasonable doubt that COVID-19 is caused by a virus. The study demonstrates that it is possible to establish a global network to quickly ascertain scientific opinion on a large international scale, with high response rate, low opt-out rate, and in a way that allows for significant (perhaps indefinite) repeatability. Measuring scientific opinion in this new way would be a valuable complement to currently available approaches, potentially informing policy decisions and public understanding across diverse fields.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Public Library of Science (PLoS), 2024. Vol. 19, no 12, article id e0313541
National Category
Philosophy Peace and Conflict Studies Other Social Sciences not elsewhere specified
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-210278DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313541ISI: 001372879800062PubMedID: 39642116Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85211711745OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-210278DiVA, id: diva2:1919149
Note

Funding Agencies|Templeton Foundation [62631]; Arts and Humanities Research Council [AH/W005077/1]

Available from: 2024-12-07 Created: 2024-12-07 Last updated: 2025-03-06

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Wiltsche, Harald

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Vickers, PeterClark, CoryGraf, SimonLandrum, AsheleySlater, MatthewWiltsche, HaraldMitchell Finnigan, Samantha
By organisation
Division of Philosophy and Applied EthicsFaculty of Arts and Sciences
In the same journal
PLOS ONE
PhilosophyPeace and Conflict StudiesOther Social Sciences not elsewhere specified

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 49 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf