liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Operational message
There are currently operational disruptions. Troubleshooting is in progress.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Costs and benefits of e-roads versus battery trucks: Uncertainty and coordination
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Economics. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. VTI Swedish Natl Rd & Transport Res Inst, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9235-0232
Katholieke Univ Leuven, Belgium.
2025 (English)In: Resources and Energy Economics, ISSN 0928-7655, E-ISSN 1873-0221, Vol. 82, article id 101492Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The EU aims to achieve climate neutrality for trucks. This paper compares the user cost of diesel trucks, battery electric trucks, and trucks that rely on overhead lines in a decision context where the developments of battery costs and overhead line investment and maintenance costs are uncertain. The user costs contain the truck capital cost and the energy costs, the possible vehicle-to- grid benefits, driver costs, and other distance costs. User costs are compared for different distance profiles and optimized battery sizes. The possible user cost developments serve as input to an analysis of investment decisions in electric motorways (e-roads). The economics of e-roads is analyzed for two representations of the EU TEN-T network. In the first analysis, average EU truck flow (veh/h) and truck trip characteristics are used. In the second representation, we consider domestic and international truck transport between two neighbouring countries with strongly diverging average traffic flows and shares of international truck trips on their TEN-T network. This allows for the analysis of the non-cooperative and cooperative solutions of the two countries. The installation of e-roads appears to be a robust investment decision for the motorways of large countries that have dense truck traffic but not for less dense countries. Cooperation between countries may increase total benefits due to economies of scale.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
ELSEVIER , 2025. Vol. 82, article id 101492
Keywords [en]
Electric trucks; Battery development; Catenary trucks; Electric roads; Coordination of investments; CBA
National Category
Energy Systems
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-212278DOI: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2025.101492ISI: 001434204300001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85217732175OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-212278DiVA, id: diva2:1945177
Note

Funding Agencies|Swedish Environmental Protection Agency [GD-2021-0002]

Available from: 2025-03-18 Created: 2025-03-18 Last updated: 2025-03-18

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Börjesson, Maria
By organisation
EconomicsFaculty of Arts and Sciences
In the same journal
Resources and Energy Economics
Energy Systems

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 52 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf