liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Humans or Machines for Teaching: Trust and Preferences among University Students
Linköping University, Department of Computer and Information Science, Artificial Intelligence and Integrated Computer Systems. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.
Linköping University, Department of Computer and Information Science, Artificial Intelligence and Integrated Computer Systems. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6020-2737
Natl Taiwan Normal Univ, Peoples R China.
Linköping University, Department of Computer and Information Science, Software and Systems. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0556-6893
2024 (English)In: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY AND COMPUTERS, ICETC 2024, ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY , 2024, p. 17-25Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Recent developments in artificial intelligence (AI) have generated discussions around and expectations for its impact in education. In a society where AI plays an increasing role, a basic understanding for the technology and its potential is considered crucial. Still, many educators feel apprehensive towards the use of AI in education, which naturally affects students' opportunities to learn about and use AI-supported solutions. Users' preference and trust in relation to these tools also becomes important when integrated in education. Bringing light on students' perceptions of AI might help educators to better understand the value of such applications. The present study aims to provide insight into how university students perceive AI in general and, more particularly, the idea of having a machine performing tasks that have traditionally been handled by a teacher or a teaching assistant. The results are based on 140 Swedish and Taiwanese university students' responses to an online questionnaire. Our results indicate that the students have quite positive perceptions of AI: they might still not feel very competent in AI, but show a large interest in the topic and are positive about its consequences for society. Nevertheless they also see potential drawbacks of the technology. As a whole, our findings indicate that Swedish and female students tend to prefer human interactions over AI-supported tools for learning.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY , 2024. p. 17-25
Keywords [en]
AI in higher education; trust; preference; student perceptions; computer science education
National Category
Didactics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-213063DOI: 10.1145/3702163.3702166ISI: 001443272500003Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85217997111ISBN: 9798400717819 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-213063DiVA, id: diva2:1952890
Conference
16th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers, Universidade do Porto, Porto, PORTUGAL, sep 18-21, 2024
Available from: 2025-04-16 Created: 2025-04-16 Last updated: 2025-04-16

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Asgari, MohsenMannila, LindaStrömbäck, Filip
By organisation
Artificial Intelligence and Integrated Computer SystemsFaculty of Science & EngineeringSoftware and Systems
Didactics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 108 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf