liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Assessment of the internal validity of the Swedish National Quality Register in Gynecological Surgery (GynOp)
Div Obstet & Gynecol Södersjukhuset, Sweden.
Norrlands Univ Hosp, Sweden.
Linköping University, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Division of Children's and Women's Health. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Region Östergötland, Center of Paediatrics and Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics in Linköping.
Karolinska Inst, Sweden.
2025 (English)In: Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, ISSN 0001-6349, E-ISSN 1600-0412, Vol. 104, no 7, p. 1390-1398Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

IntroductionThe Swedish National Quality Register in Gynecological Surgery (GynOp) is widely used in gynecological and obstetric departments throughout Sweden. With a coverage rate of 91%-98%, it collects a substantial amount of data, fulfilling a crucial role in quality assurance and research. This study aimed to assess the internal validity of key variables within the GynOp register.Material and MethodsA multicenter, single-blinded study was conducted across 10 healthcare providers. Data were collected for 150 patients at each center, with 25 patients selected from each sub-register, totaling 1500 patients. Source data were extracted from medical records and compared to the data in the GynOp register for validation. Agreement was evaluated by calculating the exact agreement and the within-interval agreement using Pearson correlation (0-1) for numerical variables and Cohen's kappa (0-1) for ordinal variables.ResultsThe primary finding was that the overall validity of key variables in the GynOp register was high when compared with source data. For example, the correlation between source data and GynOp register data was 1.00 for uterine weight and 0.97 for date of delivery, and exact agreement was 97% for grade of perineal rupture and 100% for pathological-anatomical diagnosis. Some variables such as ASA-classification, genital prolapse stage, and devices for intrauterine surgery showed moderate agreement.ConclusionsThe comparison between the GynOp register and source data demonstrates strong internal validity. This study has identified several areas for improvement, leading to the initiation of an update in the registration module of the sub-register for intrauterine surgery. Additionally, certain categorical variables, such as ASA classification and prolapse stage, should be grouped and presented as dichotomized data to enhance data quality. In the future, integrating extraction of data from the Swedish Perioperative Register (SPOR) and providing education to urogynecologists on the POP-Q system could further contribute to the improvement of data quality.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
WILEY , 2025. Vol. 104, no 7, p. 1390-1398
Keywords [en]
data quality; register data; register-based; Sweden; validity
National Category
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-213579DOI: 10.1111/aogs.15136ISI: 001477050400001PubMedID: 40289558Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105003810405OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-213579DiVA, id: diva2:1958204
Note

Funding Agencies|Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions (SALAR, in Swedish SKR)

Available from: 2025-05-14 Created: 2025-05-14 Last updated: 2026-04-02

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Borgfeldt, Christer
By organisation
Division of Children's and Women's HealthFaculty of Medicine and Health SciencesDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics in Linköping
In the same journal
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 29 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf