liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Who's Behind the Service Robot? The Impact of Avatars on Priority Decisions
Linköping University, Department of Computer and Information Science, Human-Centered Systems. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8249-7708
Linköping University, Department of Computer and Information Science, Human-Centered Systems. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0098-5391
Linköping University, Department of Computer and Information Science, Human-Centered Systems. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6883-2450
2025 (English)In: SOCIAL ROBOTICS, ICSR + AI 2024, PT I, SPRINGER-VERLAG SINGAPORE PTE LTD , 2025, Vol. 15561Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Service robots, like delivery or telepresence robots, often act as proxies for people, though this representation is not always obvious to observers. For instance, when a delivery robot cuts in line at a grocery store, the identity of the person it represents matters. The lower social status often assigned to service robots ("it's just a robot, it can wait") can become problematic in human-robot conflicts, if the represented individual (e.g., senior citizen) is treated unfairly. Previous research indicates that people tend to overlook the human behind the robot, potentially disadvantaging the service recipient. This study aimed to determine whether people are more likely to grant priority to a delivery robot when informed about the person it represents. In a between-subjects virtual reality (VR) experiment the recipient was either made apparent with an avatar or not and participants had to choose if they would give priority to a delivery robot in a grocery store queue. Results showed that while the presence of the avatar increased participants' self-reported consideration of the robot's human recipient, it did not lead to higher compliance, as the willingness to grant priority was unexpectedly high in both conditions. The results suggest that social desirability and the novelty of humanrobot interaction (HRI) may explain these outcomes and future research is discussed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
SPRINGER-VERLAG SINGAPORE PTE LTD , 2025. Vol. 15561
Series
Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, ISSN 2945-9133
Keywords [en]
human-robot interaction; service robots; avatar; virtual reality; priority decision; conflict; social norms
National Category
Robotics and automation
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-217305DOI: 10.1007/978-981-96-3522-1_1ISI: 001531722800001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105002027396ISBN: 9789819635214 (print)ISBN: 9789819635221 (electronic)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-217305DiVA, id: diva2:1995227
Conference
16th International Conference on Social Robotics-ICSR-Empowering Humanity: The Role of Social and Collaborative Robotics in Shaping Our Future, Odense, DENMARK, oct 23-26, 2024
Available from: 2025-09-04 Created: 2025-09-04 Last updated: 2025-09-04

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Babel, FranziskaThellman, SamZiemke, Tom
By organisation
Human-Centered SystemsFaculty of Arts and SciencesFaculty of Science & Engineering
Robotics and automation

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 48 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf